[ RadSafe ] Fw: Fw: Radioactive contamination of the ocean

Brennan, Mike (DOH) Mike.Brennan at DOH.WA.GOV
Mon Apr 4 18:18:20 CDT 2011


Yeah, but engineering a delivery system that bury the waste a hundred meters deep in the sediment in a subduction zone would be really cool. 


----- Forwarded Message ----
From: Jerry Cohen <jjc105 at yahoo.com>
To: "Neil, David M" <neildm at id.doe.gov>
Sent: Wed, March 30, 2011 3:04:48 PM
Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] Fw: Radioactive contamination of the ocean


That's nice, but subduction is unecessary. All that is needed is depth and 
distance. Nature will take care of the rest. There is a lot of water in the 
oceans!




________________________________
From: "Neil, David M" <neildm at id.doe.gov>
To: Jerry Cohen <jjcohen at prodigy.net>; "radsafe at agni.phys.iit.edu" 
<radsafe at agni.phys.iit.edu>
Sent: Tue, March 29, 2011 10:54:49 AM
Subject: RE: [ RadSafe ] Fw: Radioactive contamination of the ocean

Actually, the subduction zones where that would be effective tend to have 
islands along the edge of the over-riding plate.  Or continents.

Dave Neil



More information about the RadSafe mailing list