[ RadSafe ] How tough is it to build a dirty bomb?

[Doug Huffman]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

"Common sense" about a dirty bomb, here in America taking its science
from public broadcasting by journalists?

Radiation safety and health professionals might do some arithmetic
involving an area, some energy levels, some concentrations, use those to
pick some nuclides and calculate their masses and mass specific activity
and know - as professionals - just what will be required to build a
credible device.

If it's too hot to handle (as in clean up) then it's too hot to handle
to build.  I am not a professional but I have made a formally
falsifiable assertion and it should be formally falsified and not merely
controverted argumentum ad verecundiam.

On 2/10/2011 07:46, Cary Renquist wrote:
> Haven't had a chance to watch/listen/read the piece, but Lazar should
> bring some common sense to the discussion...
> 
> Cary
> --
> Cary.renquist at ezag.com
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNVC3nAAoJEIpOLnult3mg8AYH/1S0ixr4hvec9H78fFYVqx43
mcIQcNZteNjS1VU1dZGcoQuhTNtcqGcniXuy3eehz0UFDmaGT5T48cnqjAfUr5z/
kzixug2bJYMkdSp4SuasPPxB70aO2sF8Bp4eBkU914N63bqm4Wv/JBdjxSlTfMwc
PjGiwpR06eBeRVRjxSEu865ZPpYSDFo4M7KONITjlrzl7ds90ckXb5ti19U+/Z04
diI/7A0bpKIjekIGHe2ybn31eQ0VucgSSBPjmzwKhnGM4eEHg26UwqTINsTorj9W
7hN9m2amhpzeOmCBpen7ZnF3CyYTDuR97rGWn1A6d1ZuV/AWGiNIvprqinnaWTw=
=/Iqh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----