[ RadSafe ] How many curies were involved in Hiroshima

Steven Dapra sjd at swcp.com
Mon Jun 20 19:07:28 CDT 2011

June 20

         The use of depleted uranium in GW2 was not an industrial 
catastrophe.  This claim is so silly it defies description.

Steven Dapra

At 02:38 PM 6/20/2011, you wrote:

>What industrial catastrophes are bigger than Fukushima?
>I cant think of one. But maybe there is one. Certainly not 9.
>I mean Industrial right. Not earthquakes and stuff like that.
>If we call the atmospheric tests an industrial catastrophe then that 
>one certainly.
>Also the use of uranium weapons in GW2.
>But thats probably not as bad in terms of health effects as 
>Fukushima will be. You wait.
>Chris Busby
>-----Original Message-----
>From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu on behalf of Brennan, Mike  (DOH)
>Sent: Mon 20/06/2011 21:35
>To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) MailingList
>Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] How many curies were involved in Hiroshima


>This morning a concerned citizen sent me an article from Al Jezeera in
>which an activist claimed, "Fukushima is the biggest industrial
>catastrophe in the history of mankind".  It certainly is not, and
>probably isn't in the top ten.


More information about the RadSafe mailing list