[ RadSafe ] SL1
SFisher373 at aol.com
SFisher373 at aol.com
Tue Jun 21 18:23:47 CDT 2011
Franz et al,
I would say that sabotage is not the correct word to use. We present the
SL1 accident to our students, and I have read the reports, investigations
etc. I am at home, so do not have the facts in front of me. What happened
was that contrary to what was posted yesterday, they were working on the
control rods, not the fuel rods. The central rod controlled 80% of the
reactor power. The work involved stroking the control rods. For some reason,
unknown, the one individual removed the control rod. He had broken up with
his wife on the day of the incident and had his personal belongings in the
car. So was he distracted, was he trying to injure himself to get
sympathy, was it a murder/suicide (he felt that his wife may have been cheating
with the other operator on duty that day). This was after the Christmas
holidays/New Year.
The magnitude of the excursion was greater than had been predicted. There
are accounts that since this was a military reactor, it was known that
removing the central rod would cause the reactor to overheat and be damaged.
What happened was the water turned to steam and the resulting steam hammer
produced an effect far greater than predicted.
So it was a human problem, and since no one lived, we will never know.
Spencer M. Fisher
Nuclear Theory and Reactor Physics
Authorization Training
Ontario Power Generation.
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list