[ RadSafe ] How many curies were involved in Hiroshima
sjd at swcp.com
Tue Jun 21 19:34:05 CDT 2011
Note that as usual Busby does not provide citations to
anything. He doesn't even give a link to his own "paper."
At 02:20 PM 6/21/2011, you wrote:
>There will always be some entity that over estimates or under
>estimates any situation. I don't recall any credible study that
>concludes there have been any significant deaths documented in the
>numbers you state below. Now if someone wants to include any death
>that occurs in a geographical area as a result of Chernobyl, they
>can make whatever conclusion that they want to. However, there is
>absolutely no credible evidence to support this contention, even remotely.
>Sander C. Perle
>Dosimetry Services Division
>2652 McGaw Avenue
>Irvine, CA 92614
>+1 (949) 296-2306 (Office)
>+1 (949) 296-1130 (Fax)
>Mirion Technologies: http://www.mirion.com/
>"Protecting people, property and the environment"
>From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
>[mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Busby, Chris
>Sent: Monday, June 20, 2011 9:45 PM
>To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing
>List; The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
>Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] How many curies were involved in Hiroshima
>Well, so far on the basis of death toll, you will excuse me if I say
>Chernobyl outweighs all of these by orders of magnitude. I know you
>guys think only a few firemen died, but this isnt so.. Alexey
>Yablokov is right. Gogman calculated 980,000 in 1990. All the
>studies have been done. Here is my paper on the issue.
More information about the RadSafe