[ RadSafe ] How many curies were involved in Hiroshima
sjd at swcp.com
Thu Jun 23 19:03:23 CDT 2011
At 01:24 PM 6/23/2011, you wrote:
>I am afraid that is how science works.
>You compare like with like.
>So I compare Chernobyl with Fukushima.
>Chronsic internal fission product exposures.
>So do many others.
>What ICRP does (and the radsafers or health physics people do) is
>compare Fukushima with the huge acute gamma external exposure at Hiroshima.
>That is not science. It is nonsense.
"compare like with like." With whom should we compare you,
Dr. Busby? Gofman, Sternglass, Tamplin, and Caldicott?
Chernobyl and Fukushima are not "like with like." This
assertion shows your resounding ignorance of both of them.
Who are the "many others"?
More information about the RadSafe