[ RadSafe ] COMARE 14th Report: Further consideration of the incidence of childhood

[Steven Dapra]

May 7

         Yes, I'd certainly go with Busby's findings any day.

Steven Dapra


At 04:58 AM 5/7/2011, you wrote:
>Fred:
>How can you possibly believe this nonsense. It flies in the face of the
>solid scientific studies published and quoted by Busby et al.
>
>They are obviously in the pocket of the nuclear power proponents!
>;~)
>Doug
>  (PS: sarcasm is, I hope, still permitted?)
>Doug Aitken
>QHSE Advisor, Schlumberger D&M Operations Support
>Cell Phone: 713-562-8585
>(alternate e-mail: doug.aitken at slb.com )
>Mail: c/o Therese Wigzell,
>Schlumberger,
>Drilling & Measurements HQ,
>300 Schlumberger Drive, MD15,
>Sugar Land, Texas 77478
>
>
>
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
>[mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Fred Dawson
>GoogleMail
>Sent: Saturday, May 07, 2011 4:02 AM
>To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
>Subject: [ RadSafe ] COMARE 14th Report: Further consideration of the
>incidence of childhood
>
>COMARE 14th Report: Further consideration of the incidence of childhood
>leukaemia around nuclear power plants in Great Britain
>
>http://www.comare.org.uk/press_releases/14thReportPressRelease.htm
>
>Childhood leukaemia is a rare disease, affecting approximately 500 children
>every year in the UK. Nevertheless there have been numerous studies and
>reports on the possible risks of childhood leukaemia in the vicinity of
>nuclear power plants and other nuclear installations. The aim of this report
>was to undertake a further review of the incidence of childhood leukaemia in
>the vicinity of nuclear power plants (NPPs) specifically in Great Britain,
>with particular reference to recent publications and studies from other
>countries and taking into account the conclusions in the tenth and eleventh
>COMARE reports (which consider the period 1969-1993).

[edit]