[ RadSafe ] Shielding of DEVICES
Clayton J Bradt
CJB01 at health.state.ny.us
Thu Jan 5 12:50:21 CST 2012
Joe Presig wrote:
... A person who can bring to bear such a DEVICE into another nation
would probably be able to
design a radiation shield(s) to make it very difficult and/or impossible
to
detect such a DEVICE.
As Oppenheimer once responded to the question (How would you detect
such a weapon),
he wryly suggested that one needs a screwdriver to detect such DEVICES.
(i.e not some
sophisticated radiation detector(s)). Hopefully USA and other nation's
will use direct inspection of
containers, shipping packages etc. to look for nuclear DEVICES directly
....
There is no instrumental solution to this problem. Save for dismantling
every package (as Oppenheimer's remarks suggest)
before it crosses the border, there will always be ways to circumvent any
surveillance system. The amount of time and
money being spent on developing new super-duper detection systems is
largely wasted. It would be far better spent
on trying to figure out why some people want to attack us, and then
convincing them not to do so. (This of course would
risk the possibility of learning that some people might have good reasons
for hating us. It's a risk worth taking, in my view.)
Clayton J. Bradt
Principal Radiophysicist
NYS Dept. of Health
Biggs Laboratory, Room D486A
Empire State Plaza
Albany, NY 12201-0509
518-474-1993
IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential or sensitive information which is, or may be, legally privileged or otherwise protected by law from further disclosure. It is intended only for the addressee. If you received this in error or from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, please do not distribute, copy or use it or any attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this from your system. Thank you for your cooperation.
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list