[ RadSafe ] Shielding of DEVICES

Clayton J Bradt CJB01 at health.state.ny.us
Thu Jan 5 12:50:21 CST 2012


Joe Presig wrote:
 
...   A person who can bring to bear such a DEVICE into  another nation 
would probably be able to
design a radiation shield(s) to make it very difficult and/or impossible 
to 
 detect such a DEVICE.
 
     As Oppenheimer once responded to the question (How  would you detect 
such a weapon),
he wryly suggested that one needs a screwdriver to detect such DEVICES. 
(i.e not some
sophisticated radiation detector(s)).  Hopefully USA and other  nation's 
will use direct inspection of
containers, shipping packages etc. to look for nuclear DEVICES  directly
....

There is no instrumental solution to this problem.  Save for dismantling 
every package (as Oppenheimer's remarks suggest)
 before it crosses the border, there will always be ways to circumvent any 
surveillance system.  The amount of time and 
money being spent on developing new super-duper detection systems is 
largely wasted.  It would be far better spent 
on trying to figure out why some people want to attack us, and then 
convincing them not to do so.  (This of course would
risk the possibility of learning that some people might have good reasons 
for hating us.  It's a risk worth taking, in my view.)

 
Clayton J. Bradt
Principal Radiophysicist
NYS Dept. of Health
Biggs Laboratory, Room D486A
Empire State Plaza
Albany, NY 12201-0509

518-474-1993

IMPORTANT NOTICE: This e-mail and any attachments may contain confidential or sensitive information which is, or may be, legally privileged or otherwise protected by law from further disclosure. It is intended only for the addressee. If you received this in error or from someone who was not authorized to send it to you, please do not distribute, copy or use it or any attachments. Please notify the sender immediately by reply e-mail and delete this from your system. Thank you for your cooperation. 



More information about the RadSafe mailing list