[ RadSafe ] SONGS
Michael LaFontaine, P. Phys.
physics at execulink.com
Fri Jun 22 22:13:01 CDT 2012
Hopefully all can access the following.
http://nuclearstreet.com/nuclear_power_industry_news/b/nuclear_power_news/archive/2012/06/20/nrc_3A00_-faulty-steam-generator-testing_2C00_-design-to-blame-for-songs-problems-062002.aspx
If not, the text reads,
"The Nuclear Regulatory Commission pointed a finger at the design of
steam generators manufactured by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries as it
summarized recent inspections of premature tube wear at Southern
California Edison's San Onofre nuclear plant.
<http://nuclearstreet.com/cfs-file.ashx/__key/communityserver-blogs-components-weblogfiles/00-00-00-00-34/7851.san_5F00_onofre.jpg>
San Onofre nuclear plant. Source: NRC
At a public meeting Monday (video below) and in statements by NRC
personnel published over the weekend, the federal agency said
inspections point to faulty testing and design as likely causes of
steam generator problems that have kept SONGS units 2 and 3 offline
for months. At the meeting, NRC officials said MHI miscalculated the
velocity of water flowing through the steam generators by a factor of
three or four, California media reported, leading to unexpected
levels of vibration and wear.
In an interview with the Associated Press Sunday, NRC Regional
Administrator Elmo Collins said inspections have primarily pointed to
the steam generators' design. It was modified to add 400 tubes and
V-shaped support structures engineered to minimize tube wear.
Instead, eight tubes in unit 3 failed pressure tests, which Collins
said was unprecedented in the industry.
Both Combustion Engineering reactors have been under inspection since
a tube rupture and small steam leak Jan. 31 in unit 3 and the
subsequent discovery of premature tube wear in steam generators of
both units. The equipment was replaced during outages in 2009 and
2011. While MHI delivered the parts in question, Southern California
Edison is responsible for the plant's license and may face NRC
penalties resulting from the inspections. Few indications of a
possible restart date emerged during the recent NRC announcements,
although Edison executives indicated earlier they do not expect the
plant to come back online this summer."
BTW - I voted for the life extension.
Regards,
M. LaFontaine, P. Phys.
Michael LaFontaine, P. Phys.
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list