[ RadSafe ] Beyond Nuclear Claims after Washington Post Article

Maury maurysis at peoplepc.com
Thu May 3 01:01:02 CDT 2012

I'm not certain but somehow I feel just a tad suspicious that 
BeyondNuclear might be opposed to electricity production by nuclear 
means. Do you suppose? Think I too will drop a line to the WashPost 
thanking them for their editorial. I really am sorry to see Japan and 
Germany moving away from nuclear power plants.
Maury&Dog [MaurySiskel maurysis at peoplepc.com]

On 5/2/2012 8:05 AM, Bill Prestwich wrote:
> I hope Radsafe folks support the editorial. As a Canadian, I think if I
> responded the opposition would denounce foreign intervention.
> I did support the fact that this was a non-event in an E-mail to Cindy.
> Bill
> -----Original Message-----
> From: radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu
> [mailto:radsafe-bounces at agni.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Roger Helbig
> Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2012 6:09 PM
> To: radsafe at agni.phys.iit.edu
> Subject: [ RadSafe ] Beyond Nuclear Claims after Washington Post Article
> This was sent to another list by a member Peter -
> Dear friends and colleagues,
> Please see the exemplary response written to the Washington Post's
> industry-serving editorial.  And please send them a response that educates
> them on energy and people's awareness of the environment.
> Let's remember that it's not all about the supply side, despite the anxiety
> that's generated by the nuclear industry -- and that the cheapest energy is
> what we don't use.
>      Thanks, Peter :^ )}
> ________________________________
> From: Cindy Folkers, Beyond Nuclear [mailto:cindy at beyondnuclear.org]
> Washington Post calls Fukushima “non-catastrophic”!
> The editorial board needs to hear from you!
> We’re outraged. And we expect you were, too. On April 23, 2012, the
> Washington Post editorial board writers callously dismissed the Fukushima
> nuclear disaster as “non-catastrophic.”
> They eagerly promoted nuclear power while omitting inconvenient
> deal-breakers such as cost, waste, safety, health risks and human rights.

More information about the RadSafe mailing list