[ RadSafe ] High Level Waste to WIPP

Maury maurysis at peoplepc.com
Mon May 21 20:01:56 CDT 2012


Maybe we have developed a brand new class of problems: Too Valuable to Solve
Best,
Maury&Dog  [MaurySiskel maurysis at peoplepc.com]
=========================================
On 5/21/2012 6:34 PM, Jerry Cohen wrote:
> I used to think it was the NIMBY's, anti-nuks, and other assorted crazies who have prevented an accepted nukwaste solution. Now I believe it is the
> politicians, bureaucrats, and "researchers" who want to preserve their meal ticket by perpetuating the problem. Actually, HLW mgmt. is a simple problem, if all you were concerned about was the potentially harmful health and safrty  effects--- reprocess and extract useful fuel, solidify the waste in concrete, and dump it in the ocean---assuming one really wants to resolve the problem.
> "A voice in the wilderness"
>
>
>
> ________________________________
> From: Jeff Terry<terryj at iit.edu>
> To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
> <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
> Sent: Mon, May 21, 2012 2:39:28 PM
> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] High Level Waste to WIPP
>
> Hi Roy,
>
> The two counties Eddy and Lea both want the waste. They bought 1000 acres of land for repositories,
--------------------------snipped---------------------


More information about the RadSafe mailing list