[ RadSafe ] High Level Waste to WIPP

Maury maurysis at peoplepc.com
Tue May 22 13:11:13 CDT 2012

Yes, Amen, your move is seconded. Maybe a valiant anti-nuclear zealot 
could be found to lead the study of verbal perpetual motion  ... <g>
On 5/22/2012 12:11 AM, ROY HERREN wrote:
> Dear Maury and Dog,
>      I move that we convene a Blue Ribbon Commission (with us on it), vote ourselves a big industry comparable salary, and study at incredible length the
> subject of "Questions that are too valuable to solve" within the length of our professional careers.  Do I have a second on that motion?   (Is this a method to
> achieve perpetual motion?).
>   Roy Herren
> ________________________________
> From: Maury<maurysis at peoplepc.com>
> To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu; Jerry Cohen<jjc105 at yahoo.com>
> Sent: Mon, May 21, 2012 6:02:45 PM
> Subject: Re: [ RadSafe ] High Level Waste to WIPP
> Maybe we have developed a brand new class of problems: Too Valuable to Solve
> Best,
> Maury&Dog  [MaurySiskel maurysis at peoplepc.com]
> =========================================
> On 5/21/2012 6:34 PM, Jerry Cohen wrote:
>> I used to think it was the NIMBY's, anti-nuks, and other assorted crazies who have prevented an accepted nukwaste solution. Now I believe it is

More information about the RadSafe mailing list