[ RadSafe ] More from Helen Caldicott

Thu Oct 31 09:43:21 CDT 2013

If your blood pressure needs a little picking up, here's a NY Times op-ed piece (http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/31/opinion/radiation-fears-are-real.html?_r=1&) from everyone's favorite radiologically ignorant anti-nuke. To the best of my knowledge there's not a single thing she says here that's accurate, except that the NYAS did release an egregiously inaccurate report in 2009 that's as much at odds with reality as the following piece. Sigh....


Radiation Fears Are Real
Published: October 30, 2013
To the Editor:
Re "Taming Radiation Fears<http://www.nytimes.com/2013/10/22/opinion/fear-vs-radiation-the-mismatch.html>" (Op-Ed, Oct. 22):
David Ropeik, a specialist on risk perception and risk communication, plays down the mass of scientific and medical literature that amply demonstrates that ionizing radiation is a potent carcinogen and that no dose is low enough not to induce cancer.
Large areas of the world are becoming contaminated by long-lived nuclear elements secondary to catastrophic meltdowns: 40 percent of Europe from Chernobyl, and much of Japan.
A New York Academy of Sciences report from 2009 titled "Chernobyl" estimates that nearly a million have already died from this catastrophe. In Japan, 10 million people reside in highly contaminated locations.
Children are 10 to 20 times more radiosensitive than adults, and fetuses thousands of times more so; women are more sensitive than men.
Radiation of the reproductive organs induces genetic mutations in the sperm and eggs, increasing the incidence of genetic diseases like diabetes, cystic fibrosis, hemochromatosis and thousands of others over future generations. Recessive mutations take up to 20 generations to be expressed.
Bermagui, Australia, Oct. 23, 2013
The writer is the pediatrician, author and antinuclear advocate.

More information about the RadSafe mailing list