[ RadSafe ] RadSafe Digest, Vol 1582, Issue 1

[Stewart Smith]

Tim,

Yes, for the Site analysis of samples, we use the interference corrected activity. In the case of the efficiency verification, we are looking at the line activity, especially for the 898 keV Y-88 photopeak, as this peak is relatively close to the 910 keV photopeak for Thorium.


Thank you,

Stewart R. Smith, EnergySolutions

Stewart R. Smith

EnergySolutions Field Office
99 Crestview Drive Extension
Transfer, PA 16154

203-558-1213

ssmith at energysolutions.com

CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE

The information in this email may be confidential and/or privileged. This email is intended to be reviewed by only the individual or organization named above. If you are not the intended recipient or an authorized representative of the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any review, dissemination or copying of this email and its attachments, if any, or the information contained herein is prohibited. If you have received this email in error, please immediately notify the sender by return email and delete this email from your system.
 Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail
 



-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu [mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of radsafe-request at health.phys.iit.edu
Sent: Friday, May 09, 2014 1:00 PM
To: radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu
Subject: RadSafe Digest, Vol 1582, Issue 1

Send RadSafe mailing list submissions to
	radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
	http://health.phys.iit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/radsafe
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
	radsafe-request at health.phys.iit.edu

You can reach the person managing the list at
	radsafe-owner at health.phys.iit.edu

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of RadSafe digest..."


Important!

To keep threads/discussions more easily readable PLEASE observe the following guideline when replying to a message or digest:

1. When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of radsafe digest ..."
2. Do NOT include the entire digest in your reply. Include ONLY the germane sentences to which you're responding.

Thanks!_______________________________________________


Today's Topics:

   1. Kelp Watch Report - No CS-134 Reported (Roger Helbig)


----------------------------------------------------------------------

Message: 1
Date: Thu, 8 May 2014 18:04:46 -0700
From: Roger Helbig <rwhelbig at gmail.com>
Subject: [ RadSafe ] Kelp Watch Report - No CS-134 Reported
To: RADSAFE <radsafe at health.phys.iit.edu>
Message-ID:
	<CALZ0NqXrVDuH5RX2OALYmeaV+ehePHcHL5T3LRz9sLB406N+6Q at mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

 http://lbpost.com/news/2000003668-first-sample-of-kelp-watch-2014-shows-no-sign-of-fukushima-based-radioactivity
- this was pleasant sight inside today's Contra Costa Times newspaper

Roger Helbig


------------------------------

_______________________________________________
RadSafe mailing list
RadSafe at health.phys.iit.edu
http://health.phys.iit.edu/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/radsafe


End of RadSafe Digest, Vol 1582, Issue 1
****************************************