[ RadSafe ] radiation monitor setpoint question
JOHN.RICH at sargentlundy.com
JOHN.RICH at sargentlundy.com
Wed Jan 11 09:21:47 CST 2017
As a general rule in the "olden days", it was assumed that a radiation
monitor setpoint should not be in the lowest or highest decade of the
monitor range. With the new digital technology, it seems like that rule
could be abandoned as long as the setpoint is statistically significant.
(e.g., 2sigma, or 3sigma above background could be acceptable.)
The question is: is there experience that, for example, indicates that the
middle of the lowest decade (or middle of the highest decade) works well.
thx in advance - - jmr
John Rich
Manager/Consultant 2
Nuclear Power Technologies
Sargent & Lundy
55 East Monroe Street | Chicago, IL 60603
office: 1-312-269-3768 | mobile: 1-561-676-8144
email :john.rich at sargentlundy.com
More information about the RadSafe
mailing list