[ RadSafe ] *** SPAM *** RE: Assessing Fukushima-derived radiocesium in migratory Pacific predators

Bob Cherry bobcherry at satx.rr.com
Tue Jul 18 20:31:43 CDT 2017

Spam detection software, running on the system "agni.phys.iit.edu", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.

Content preview:  << report no detectable (i.e., ≥ 0.1 Bq kg-1 dry wt) of
  Fukushima-derived 134Cs in all samples,>> So, maybe they detected some "non-Fukushima-derived"
   cesium-134? And how can they tell if any cesium-134 they detect is from Fukushima?
   Setting aside my sarcasm, the author (and editor) should not have included
   "Fukushima-derived" in the text. [...] 

Content analysis details:   (7.3 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 0.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL      RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address
                            [ listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
 3.6 RCVD_IN_PBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
                            [ listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
 1.0 SPF_SOFTFAIL           SPF: sender does not match SPF record (softfail)
 1.3 RDNS_NONE              Delivered to internal network by a host with no rDNS
 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY      Informational: message has unparseable relay lines
 1.4 DOS_OUTLOOK_TO_MX      Delivered direct to MX with Outlook headers

More information about the RadSafe mailing list