[ RadSafe ] *** SPAM *** Photon Flux to EXPOSURE

[Ted de Castro]

Spam detection software, running on the system "agni.phys.iit.edu", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message
has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label
similar future email.  If you have any questions, see
the administrator of that system for details.

Content preview:  I have run into a problem where I have a known intensity beam
   of photons - too small and too intense and too low an energy to actually
  measure with all but maybe one instrument - which I don't have and am not
  about to get - and I need to come up with a shield value. And even that is
   ridiculous since the beam cross section is so small it hard to decide how
   any regulatory limits apply. I think the get the actual DOSE rate - I'd have
   to do monte carlo calculations - not going there. It not hard to come up
  with a energy flux and make assumptions about attenuation in say water and
   calculate RADs to water - or Sv if you must! [...] 

Content analysis details:   (5.5 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ---------------------- --------------------------------------------------
 1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL        RBL: Relay in RNBL,
                            https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/
                            [24.4.193.21 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
 0.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL      RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP address
                            [24.4.193.21 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
 3.6 RCVD_IN_PBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
                            [24.4.193.21 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
 0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL            SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral)
 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY      Informational: message has unparseable relay lines