[ RadSafe ] [Non-DoD Source] *** SPAM *** Photon Flux to EXPOSURE (UNCLASSIFIED)

[Falo, Gerald A CIV USARMY MEDCOM APHC (US)]

Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE

Ted,

I don't know if it helps but ICRP-116 contains a database  of "ICRP/ICRU
Database of Dose Conversion Coefficients;" for example, they have a table of
effective dose conversion coefficients in units of pSv cm-2 for various
geometries for 0.01 to 10,000 Mev.

Jerry
________________________________

Gerald A. Falo, Ph.D., CHP
U.S. Army Public Health Center - Health Physics Division
gerald.a.falo.civ at mail.mil
gerald.a.falo.civ at mail.smil.mil
410-436-4852
DSN: 584-4852

-----Original Message-----
From: radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu
[mailto:radsafe-bounces at health.phys.iit.edu] On Behalf Of Ted de Castro
Sent: Thursday, March 16, 2017 2:16 AM
To: The International Radiation Protection (Health Physics) Mailing List
Subject: [Non-DoD Source] [ RadSafe ] *** SPAM *** Photon Flux to EXPOSURE

All active links contained in this email were disabled.  Please verify the
identity of the sender, and confirm the authenticity of all links contained
within the message prior to copying and pasting the address to a Web
browser.  




----

Spam detection software, running on the system "agni.phys.iit.edu", has
identified this incoming email as possible spam.  The original message has
been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar
future email.  If you have any questions, see the administrator of that
system for details.

Content preview:  I have run into a problem where I have a known intensity
beam
   of photons - too small and too intense and too low an energy to actually
  measure with all but maybe one instrument - which I don't have and am not
  about to get - and I need to come up with a shield value. And even that is
   ridiculous since the beam cross section is so small it hard to decide how
   any regulatory limits apply. I think the get the actual DOSE rate - I'd
have
   to do monte carlo calculations - not going there. It not hard to come up
  with a energy flux and make assumptions about attenuation in say water and
   calculate RADs to water - or Sv if you must! [...] 

Content analysis details:   (5.5 points, 5.0 required)

 pts rule name              description
---- ----------------------
--------------------------------------------------
 1.3 RCVD_IN_RP_RNBL        RBL: Relay in RNBL,
                            Caution-https://senderscore.org/blacklistlookup/
                            [24.4.193.21 listed in bl.score.senderscore.com]
 0.0 RCVD_IN_SORBS_DUL      RBL: SORBS: sent directly from dynamic IP
address
                            [24.4.193.21 listed in dnsbl.sorbs.net]
 3.6 RCVD_IN_PBL            RBL: Received via a relay in Spamhaus PBL
                            [24.4.193.21 listed in zen.spamhaus.org]
 0.7 SPF_NEUTRAL            SPF: sender does not match SPF record (neutral)
 0.0 T_DKIM_INVALID         DKIM-Signature header exists but is not valid
 0.0 UNPARSEABLE_RELAY      Informational: message has unparseable relay
lines



Classification: UNCLASSIFIED
Caveats: NONE