[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Gamma Ray Constant for F-18
The table specification was exposure rate gamma constant with the
Radiophamaceutical Internal Dosimetry Information Center (1985) given as
the reference.
"Heinmiller, Bruce" <heinmillerb@aecl.ca>@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu on
01/31/2000 02:44:51 PM
Please respond to radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
Sent by: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
To: Multiple recipients of list <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
cc:
Subject: RE: Gamma Ray Constant for F-18
If they specified "gamma constant", I'm a bit dubious about a reference
that
talks at the same time about a gamma ray constant and which x-rays were
excluded! Many errors have been made (OK, maybe not with F-18) confusing
two related but quite different quantities - specific gamma constant and
specific exposure rate constant.
Bruce Heinmiller CHP
heinmillerb@aecl.ca
> ----------
> From: David Whitfill[SMTP:DWhitfil@kdhe.state.ks.us]
> Reply To: radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
> Sent: Monday, January 31, 2000 3:19 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: Re: Gamma Ray Constant for F-18
>
>
>
> I just ran across a data sheet prepared by Mallinckrodt which gives the
> gamma constant for F-18 as 5.72905 R-cm^2 per h-mCi. There is a note
which
> says the calculations exclude all X-rays < 20 keV.
>
> ============================================
> The handbook of Health Physics and Radiological Health, 3rd ed., gives
> this
> value for F-18:
>
> 1.879E-04 mSv-m^2 per h-MBq = 6.95 rem-cm^2/h-mCi
>
> If you assume 1 rem = 1 rad = 1 R you're finished, but..
>
> X air, R = D tissue, rad/(0.87 rad/R) x (uen/p air)/(uen/p tissue)
>
> Using an energy of 500 keV (close to 511 keV), the energy-absorption
> coefficients are 2.966E-02 cm^2/g for air and
>
> 3.304E-02 cm^2/g for adipose tissue (RHH 5-24,25) and the correction
> factor
> with 1 rem = 1 rad is 1.03:
>
> 7.16 rem-cm^2/h-mCi
>
> =============================================
> >I am looking for the true Gamma Ray Constant for F-18 in the nostalgic
> units of R/hr-cm^2/mCi. There have been values reported in the range of
> 5.7 - 8. Can anyone pin it down for me?
> >
> Scott Dube
> sdube@queens.org
>
> ************************************************************************
> The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
> information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
>
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html