RE: 436.37 keV

["Boyce, Dale" <DBoyce@intiso.com>]

Sorry if I just sent a blank reply.  Outlook has the reply and send buttons
in the same place on the screen.

My guess is that you are seeing the double excape peak from K-40.

1460 - 1022 = 438

Dale

dboyce@intiso.com

> -----Original Message-----
> From:	dpharrison@aep.com [SMTP:dpharrison@aep.com]
> Sent:	Wednesday, March 15, 2000 4:54 AM
> To:	Multiple recipients of list
> Subject:	436.37 keV
> 
> 
> 
> I'm looking at a gamma spec printout and at the identified 436.37 keV
> peak.
> It's of sufficient abundance that I can't discount/reject it.  Anyone know
> what
> radionuclide this peak belongs to?  The rest of the identified peaks are
> of
> natural background.  Thanks.
> 
> David Harrison
> dpharrison@aep.com
> 
> 
> ************************************************************************
> The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
> information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html