RE: Exit signs in aircraft

["Jean-Francois, Stephane" <stephane_jeanfrancois@merck.com>]

Joel, I think That Franz was relating to the facts that most military forces
are not required to follow radiation protection legislation for National
Security reasons.

But OF COURSE they will do as much as possible to protect members of the
public (At least I hope they do)!I am aware of many good health physicists
with an Army background.

One of the problem is when the regulated products ...is OUT in the open (as
military like to say)and it did happen in Canada more then once...

So hopefully, this discussion will not escalade.

As for the original message, I recall some company in Canada, I will look
for a name and number.

Stephane Jean-Francois, Eng., CHP

Specialiste en radioprotection/Radiation Safety Specialist
Gestion des risques/Risk Management
Merck Frosst Canada & Co
TEL: 514.428.8695
FAX; 514.428.8541
email: stephane_jeanfrancois@merck.com 

-----Original Message-----
From: Joel Baumbaugh [mailto:baumbaug@nosc.mil]
Sent: Wednesday, March 22, 2000 5:14 PM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: Re: Exit signs in aircraft



>  Please keep in mind that military equipment usually is not subject to 
> radiation protection
>legislation!
>
>Franz
>
         I would not "presume" to speak for YOUR military, but in the U.S. 
Navy, we take it VERY seriously...

         Joel Baumbaugh (baumbaug@nosc.mil)
         SSC-SD

************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html