[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Institute for Environmental Health Sciences
Title: Re: Institute for Environmental Health
Sciences
for example,
what sort of exposure produces cancer)
then I believe that simply publishing
a list is significantly
misleading.
Contrary to the posting the IEHS DID provide this
information.
To quote the report.
KNOWN TO BE A
HUMAN CARCINOGEN NINTH REPORT ON CARCINOGENS
ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGE CONSUMPTION
Consumption of
alcoholic beverages is known to be a human carcinogen based on
sufficient evidence of carcinogenicity from human studies that
indicate a causal relationship between consumption of alcoholic
beverages and cancer in humans (reviewed in IARC V. 44, 1988;
Longnecker and Enger, 1996). Studies indicate that the risk of cancer
is most pronounced among smokers and at the highest levels of
consumption. Consumption of alcoholic beverages is causally
related to cancers of the mouth, pharynx, larynx, and
esophagus. Cohort and case control studies in a variety of human
populations are notable for their consistency in reporting the
presence of moderate to strong associations with dose-response
relationships for these four sites. Evidence also supports a weaker
but possibly causal relation between alcoholic beverage consumption
and increased risk of cancers of the liver and breast (Longnecker,
1994). The effect of a given level of alcoholic beverage intake on
absolute risks of cancer of the mouth, pharynx, larynx, and esophagus
is influenced by other factors, especially smoking. However, smoking
does not explain the observed increased risk of cancers associated
with increased alcoholic beverage consumption. No adequate
experimental animal carcinogenicity studies of alcoholic beverages
have been reported in the literature. Studies specifically examining
the carcinogenicity of ethanol in animals have not yielded results
that would suggest that the ethanol component of alcoholic beverages
is solely responsible for the increases in cancer observed in people
consuming alcoholic beverages.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELEVANT TO CARCINOGENESIS OR
POSSIBLE
MECHANISMS OF
CARCINOGENESIS
Increased frequencies of chromosomal aberrations, sister chromatid
exchanges, and aneuploidies have been found in the peripheral
lymphocytes of alcoholics. Ethanol-free extracts of some alcoholic
beverages induced sister chromatid exchanges in human cells in vitro
and mutations in bacteria (IARC V. 44, 1988). The mechanism by
which consumption of alcoholic beverages can cause cancers in humans
is not established.
KNOWN TO BE A HUMAN CARCINOGEN NINTH REPORT ON CARCINOGENS
STRONG INORGANIC ACID MISTS CONTAINING SULFURIC ACID
CAS No. 7664-93-9 (Sulfuric Acid)
First listed in the Ninth Report on Carcinogens
CARCINOGENICITY
Occupational
exposure to strong inorganic acid mists containing sulfuric acid is
known to be a human carcinogen, based on sufficient evidence of
carcinogenicity from studies in humans that indicate a causal
relationship between exposure to strong inorganic acid mists
containing sulfuric acid and human cancer (reviewed in IARC V.
54, 1992). Occupational exposures to strong inorganic
acid mists containing sulfuric acid are specifically associated with
laryngeal and lung cancer in humans. Steenland et al. (1988) reported
on studies of one U. S. cohort of male workers in pickling operations
in the steel industry, which showed excesses of laryngeal
cancer after adjusting for smoking and other potential confounding
variables [standardized incidence rate ratio (SIR)for laryngeal
cancer was 2. 30 (95%confidence interval [CI ], 1. 05-4. 36)].
In a ten-year follow-up, Steenland (1997) reported a laryngeal
cancer rate ratio of 2. 2 (95%CI, 1. 2-3. 7), consistent
with previous findings from this cohort. In a nested case-control
study of workers in a U. S. petrochemical plant, Soskolne
et al. (1984)found a dose-response for laryngeal cancer risk among
workers exposed to moderate (odds ratio [OR ] of 4. 6;;95%CI,
0. 83-25. 35)or high levels (OR of 13. 4;95%CI, 2. 08- 85.
99)of sulfuric acid. In a Canadian population based case-control
study, after controlling for tobacco and alcohol use and
including only the most specific exposure scale, Soskolne et
al. (1992)also observed a dose-response for laryngeal cancer
risk in workers exposed to sulfuric acid mist, with ORs of 2.
52 (95%CI, 0. 80-7. 91)at the lowest level of exposure and 6.
87 (95% CI, 1. 00-47. 06)at the highest. A report of a similar
population based case-control study in Canada by Siemiatycki
(1991)suggested an increase in risk for oat-cell carcinoma of the
lung (rate ratio [RR ]of 2. 0;90%CI, 1. 3-2. 9). Steenland and
Beaumont (1989), reporting on the same U. S. cohort of male
workers in pickling operations described by Steenland et al.
(1988), found an excess of lung cancer in these workers after
adjusting for smoking and other potential confounding variables
[standardized mortality ratio (SMR)for lung cancer was 1. 36
(95%CI, 0. 97-1. 84)]. No adequate experimental
animal carcinogenicity studies of sulfuric acid or strong inorganic
acid mists containing sulfuric acid have been reported in the
literature. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELEVANT TO CARCINOGENESIS
OR POSSIBLE MECHANISMS OF CARCINOGENESIS The manufacture of isopropyl
alcohol by the strong acid process, which uses sulfuric acid, has
been identified by IARC as known to cause an increased incidence of
cancer of the paranasal sinuses in workers (reviewed in IARC V. 15,
1977). O S O OH HO
Paul
Lavely
<lavelyp@uclink4.berkeley.edu>