[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: DOE Construction & Restoration Projects



The old Article 371 item 3 said that "...respiratory protection could be
used as a normal conduct of operation..." in restoration projects "due to a
lack of engineering controls and the temporary nature of the work".  This
"dispensation?" has been removed.  This is different from current
philosophy/requirements.

Tom Goff
WIPP Radiological Engineering
(505) 234-8861
(fax)  234-6027
e-mail  GoffT@WIPP.Carlsbad.NM.US
page (505) 234-8850  (pager 479)
P.O. Box 2078
Carlsbad, NM 88221
Radiological Engineering:  Anticipating Radiological Problems
             Developing Techniques to Deal with Them


-----Original Message-----
From: OFFTOWY@aol.com [mailto:OFFTOWY@aol.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 31, 2000 7:20 AM
To: Multiple recipients of list
Subject: Re: DOE Construction & Restoration Projects


I think you will find that Article 371 of the RCM did not really establish 
any requirements or guidance that was not included elsewhere in DOE's system

of requirements and guidance, nor did it really provide any guidance that
was 
applicable specifically and only to construction projects.  Guidance on use 
of respiratory protection devices is provided in DOE's IH program documents,

which I believe adopt OSHA requirements and guidance.

Lew LaGarde
e-mail - offtowy@aol.com
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html