[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Disposal of clinical wastes containing radio-isotopes
Unless I am mistaken, the diaper is in Hong Kong, which means that any
regulatory caveats that may
apply, probably are not the caveats that you have in mind.
Just a quick thought.
Regards,
GL
William Lorenzen <LORENZEN_W@A1.TCH.Harvard.edu> on 07/11/2000 12:43:43 PM
Please respond to radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu
To: Multiple recipients of list <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
cc: (bcc: Greg Landry/CI/US/PBC)
Subject: Re: Disposal of clinical wastes containing radio-isotopes
My understanding is that if the diaper is under the licensees
control then the licensee is responsible for the proper disposal
(which is not the sanitary sewer for a diaper)
If you allow someone to walk out of your institution with
"licensed" radioactive material all the regulatory caveats apply.
Only patient excreta disposed of via sanitary sewer is exempt and
not the incidental diaper.
Also I disagree with the statement that the waste transfer
facilities ignore the short half-life material. At least in this
part of the country these facilities can not and do not
differentiate short lived from long lived. They only know the
alarm went off and they have to deal with it....
Most alarming systems (from my experience in the NE) are Na(I)
detectors connected to a simple alarming ratemeter.
I do agree it is not a safety issue, but a regulatory debacle.
William A. Lorenzen, M.S.
Radiation Safety Officer
Children's Hospital
Boston, Ma 02115
lorenzen_w@a1.tch.harvard.edu
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html