[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Civil Penalty for Medical Violation

To: <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
Subject: RE: Civil Penalty for Medical Violation
From: OFFTOWY@aol.com
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 14:15:45 EDT

Peter G. Vernig wrote:

>Guidance documents ARE NOT REGULATION unless we let them be!  You do not have to accept NRC guidance when it doesn't make sense.  <

When you have the approval of a multi-billion dollar facility's operating license waiting for someone to buy off on a "suggested" commitment to a guidance document, believe me, it's a requirement.

Lew LaGarde
offtowy@aol.com
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html

Prev by Date: RE: Request info about on Rad Batteries
Next by Date: A question about medical training
Prev by thread: RE: Civil Penalty for Medical Violation
Next by thread: RE: civil penalty for medical violation
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread