Re: "Anti-nuke clamor"

["edith gbur" <egbur@adelphia.net>]

----- Original Message -----
From: <BLHamrick@aol.com>
To: "Multiple recipients of list" <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
Sent: Friday, August 04, 2000 11:00 PM
Subject: Re: "Anti-nuke clamor"


> In a message dated 08/04/2000 8:46:42 PM Pacific Daylight Time,
> ruth_weiner@email.msn.com writes:
>
> << Personally, I'm kind of sorry I responded.  The argument "the
anti-nukes
> are
>  responsible for creating your job ... no they aren't ... yes they are ...
no
>  they aren't ...yes they are ..." is hardly constructive or enlightening.
>>
>
> I would tend to agree, but can't help but add that for those who are
> creative, hard-working, and reasonably intelligent, there are more
> opportunities in this world for success than failure, and whether nuclear
> power re-establishes itself in this country, or is snuffed out like a
candle,
> there will be plenty of jobs for good, solid scientists.
>
> Barbara L. Hamrick
> BLHamrick@aol.com
> ************************************************************************
> The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
> information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html

************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html