[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Mercury in coal airborne impacts
- To: RADSAFE <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
- Subject: Re: Mercury in coal airborne impacts
- From: Susan Gawarecki <loc@icx.net>
- Date: Tue, 08 Aug 2000 14:10:00 -0400
- Organization: ORR Local Oversight Committee
The problem with mercury is that it is a very volatile metal. Most of
it goes out the stack in a gaseous form.
Ruth wrote:
> If the Hg is 1 ppm by weight, and the coal is 10% ash, and
> assuming all the Hg in ash goes into fly ash -- a bad assumption -- the Hg
> emitted would be
>
> 6E6 tons coal/yr * 160 lb ash/ton coal * 1E-6 lb Hg/lb ash = 960 lb Hg/year
>
> or about half a ton. Now, since uranium (that I happen to know about)
> partitions 75% in bottom ash, 25% in fly ash, I would assume conservatively
> that mercury would at least partition 50/50, so an uncontrolled plant would
> emit about 1 quarter ton per year.
--
==================================================
Susan L. Gawarecki, Ph.D., Executive Director
Oak Ridge Reservation Local Oversight Committee, Inc.
136 S Illinois Ave, Ste 208, Oak Ridge, TN 37830
Phone (865) 483-1333; Fax (865) 482-6572; E-mail loc@icx.net
==================================================
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html