Re: wartime ethics

["dkosloff1" <dkosloff1@email.msn.com>]

Andy,

I did not mean to imply that an apology was in order.  However, I accepted
it the instant I saw the word.  I felt that the sentence on perception was
imprecise, but based on my reading and personal experience (including some
on the USS PLUNGER) I am sensitive to the easy transition from right to
wrong.

Don Kosloff dkosloff1@email.msn.com
2910 Main St., PERRY OH 44081

----- Original Message -----
From: "Karam, Andrew" <Andrew_Karam@URMC.Rochester.edu>
To: "Multiple recipients of list" <radsafe@romulus.ehs.uiuc.edu>
Sent: Thursday, August 10, 2000 8:14 AM
Subject: RE: wartime ethics


> OK, you've got me there.  I was not thinking of the things that are
> documented to have actually taken place but, instead, of some of the more
> interesting theorizing.  You are, of course, right, and as far as I can
> tell, all sides in virtually every conflict have done things that can be
> considered evil.  In any event, I stand corrected, and please accept my
> apologies for this mis-statement.
>
> Andy



************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html