[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Power Plant Pollution Linked to 30,000 Premature Deaths Each Year
Just another reason to promote and utilize nuclear power plants. -
-just another environmentalist for nuclear power
Paul Pollan, RRPT
Southern Nuclear
pbpollan@southernco.com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Susan Gawarecki [SMTP:loc@icx.net]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 6:29 PM
> To: Multiple recipients of list
> Subject: Power Plant Pollution Linked to 30,000 Premature Deaths Each
> Year
>
> Power Plant Pollution Linked to 30,000 Premature Deaths Each Year
> By Brian Hansen
>
> WASHINGTON, DC, October 17, 2000 (ENS) - Pollution generated by
> U.S. power plants is responsible for cutting short the lives of over
> 30,000 Americans each year, more deaths than are caused by
> murderers or drunk drivers.
>
> The figures are contained in a groundbreaking new report unveiled
> today by a coalition of environmental and public health groups.
>
> The report, which puts forth a damning indictment of U.S. regulatory
> policies, is titled, "Death, Disease and Dirty Power: Mortality and
> Health Damage Due to Air Pollution from Power Plants."
>
> The analysis is the first ever attempt to quantify the deaths and
> other health effects attributable exclusively to the fine particle
> pollution produced by the nation's coal and oil fired power plants.
>
> As of January 1, 1999, coal fired capacity represented 40 percent of the
> nation's electric generating capacity in 1998. Gas fired capacity
> accounted for 21 percent; nuclear for 13 percent; hydroelectricity for
> 13 percent; petroleum for 9.3 percent; and renewables for 2.8 percent.
>
> <snip>
>
> The full text of the Clear the Air report on the health effects of
> power plant pollution is available on the group's Web site, located at
> http://www.cleartheair.org.
>
> Complete news story at:
> http://ens-news.com/ens/oct2000/2000L-10-17-15.html
>
> My comment:
>
> I noted that this report doesn't attempt to quantify the deaths due to
> resource extraction (coal mining, oil drilling) or transportation,
> although the numbers cited for pollution deaths make for an interesting
> comparison to the 23 excess deaths predicted from exposure to radiation
> from transport of nuclear waste.
>
> I expect that these estimates suffer from the same shortcomings as do
> the risk assessments done on the nuclear power cycle, so don't be quick
> to hold them up as gospel.
>
> Any opinions expressed are my own.
>
> Regards,
> Susan
> --
> .....................................................
> Susan L. Gawarecki, Ph.D., Executive Director
> Oak Ridge Reservation Local Oversight Committee
> -----
> The LOC newsletter "Insights" is posted on our Web site
> http://www.local-oversight.org - E-mail loc@icx.net
> .....................................................
> ************************************************************************
> The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
> information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html
************************************************************************
The RADSAFE Frequently Asked Questions list, archives and subscription
information can be accessed at http://www.ehs.uiuc.edu/~rad/radsafe.html