[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Hiranuma to visit Niigata over controversial MOX fuel plan
Index:
Hiranuma to visit Niigata over controversial MOX fuel plan
Economics likely to hamper British nuclear revival
EU energy chief eyes continued coal subsidies
Japan to urge Asia-Pacific to help strengthen IAEA safeguards
SA Parliament told hospital kept organs without consent
Bush picks Brookhaven chief for top tech post
========================================
Hiranuma to visit Niigata over controversial MOX fuel plan
TOKYO, June 26 (Kyodo) - Economy, Trade and Industry Minister Takeo
Hiranuma said Tuesday he will visit Niigata Prefecture on Saturday to
meet with local senior government officials about the controversial
plan to use plutonium-uranium mixed oxide (MOX) fuel in nuclear power
plants.
The move comes in response to the rejection May 27 by residents of
the village of Kariwa in the prefecture of Tokyo Electric Power Co.'s
''pluthermal'' plan to use MOX fuel in its Kashiwazaki-Kariwa nuclear
plant.
Hiranuma said he will meet Niigata Gov. Ikuo Hirayama, Kashiwazaki
Mayor Masazumi Saikawa, and Kariwa Mayor Hiroo Shinada.
He is also expected to visit Tokyo Electric's Kashiwazaki-Kariwa
nuclear plant, ministry officials said. It will be Hiranuma's first
visit to Niigata as the industry minister.
Hiranuma said he will explain the government's stance over the
pluthermal project to the local officials.
The government and power companies want to use MOX fuel in commonly
used light-water reactors. But so far it has not been used at any of
Japan's nuclear plants due to public concern about its safety.
----------------
Economics likely to hamper British nuclear revival
LONDON (Reuters) - Nuclear power, dead and buried across much of
Europe, is back under the spotlight in Britain after the government
this week launched an in-depth review of the nation's future energy
needs.
New Energy Minister Brian Wilson, who is said to be pro-nuclear, said
Monday the government would look at what role nuclear power could
play in Britain's future energy mix, as well as assessing coal, gas,
oil and renewables.
The move comes six years after the UK last commissioned a reactor and
underscores nuclear's one big advantage over fossil fuels - the
absence of greenhouse gas emissions which many scientists believe
cause global warming.
But analysts said they doubted the economics of hugely expensive new
reactors, which can take up to a decade to build, could be made to
work in a liberalized energy market characterized by tumbling
electricity prices.
"The decision to invest is down to commercial companies looking for a
particular rate of return which make it difficult to justify nuclear
unless there are very large premiums for emission reductions," said
Neil Cornelius at industry consultants ICF.
"I don't see emissions permits as sufficiently valuable in the short
to medium term to make up (for the high start-up costs)," he said.
New nuclear power stations cost three to four billion pounds ($4-$6
billion) to build, about four times as much as a gas-fired plant,
analysts say.
"If you needed to make serious investment without any guaranteed
return in deregulated markets then that could be very tricky," said
David Newbery, an energy expert at Cambridge University.
JUGGLING OBJECTIVES
The clock is ticking for Britain's energy policymakers who must
juggle the need for long-term, secure energy supply with a target of
cutting greenhouse gas emissions by 23 percent below 1990 levels by
2010.
Nuclear accounts for roughly 22 percent of electricity supply in the
UK, with coal and gas about a third each.
Renewable energy like wind and solar power accounts for just under
three percent of supply, including hydro-electric plants.
Renewed prospects for nuclear power in the UK, where the last reactor
was built in 1995, drew sharp condemnation from environmentalists.
"This energy review, and the fight against climate change, must not
be used as an excuse to build a new generation of nuclear reactors,"
said Friends of the Earth campaigner Mark Johnson.
In addition to worries about safety, a big issue is how to dispose of
radioactive nuclear waste from the plants which takes thousands of
years to decay.
A reprieve for nuclear power in the UK would go against the approach
taken across much of Europe.
Germany and Sweden have taken the plunge and decided to phase out
nuclear energy and most other EU states are not actively developing
nuclear power.
But France still relies on nuclear energy for 80 percent of
electricity. Finland is alone is expanding its nuclear sector with
plans to build a fifth reactor.
LIFE SPAN EXTENSION UNCERTAIN
Analysts said it was unclear to what extent Britain could minimize
the need to build new reactors by extending the life of existing
plants.
"To determine the potential for life extension you need a sustained
period of continuous operation over several years," said Stewart
Gray, analyst at Scotland-based consultants Wood Mackenzie.
"Most of (British Energy's) AGR reactors have been up, down, broken
and fixed. Life extension is a very uncertain issue," he said.
But he said on current evidence it appeared the UK's aging
reactors would shut before their counterparts in mainland Europe.
State-owned British Nuclear Fuels has already started shutting down
its old Magnox plants and plans to switch them all off by 2021.
But Gray did not rule new nuclear stations in Britain in the longer
term.
"My guess is that the UK would like to see new builds in the U.S.
first but in that case we would be looking at 20 years down the line
for new plants in the UK," he said.
----------------
EU energy chief eyes continued coal subsidies
BRUSSELS, June 26 (Reuters) - The European Union's energy policy
chief said on Tuesday that she would propose allowing Europe's coal
industry to continue to receive aid despite EU plans to phase out
fossil fuel subsidies by 2010.
EU Energy Commissioner Loyola de Palacio said subsidies should be
allowed for coal, alongside those for renewable energies, as a way of
securing energy supplies for the bloc, which is heavily dependent on
imported fuel.
"Aid to coal must be phased out by 2010, by which time all countries
will have to have made significant reductions in their gas emissions
required by the Kyoto protocol (on climate change)," de Palacio said
in a statement.
"But it is important thereafter to maintain a strategic reserve,
meaning some of the infrastructure, qualified personnel and
technological experience," she added.
De Palacio has said in the past she favoured keeping a low level of
coal producing capacity in the EU and that this would have to be
subsidised, but this was the clearest statement to date that she
would formally propose EU rules allowing coal subsidies well into the
future.
"In the coming weeks I will propose measures that aim to create a
platform of subsidised primary energies consisting of coal and
renewable energy sources -- it's a matter of improving the security
of energy supply in Europe," she said.
De Palacio has angered environmentalists by her comments that coal --
a major source of greenhouse gas -- and nuclear power were good
indigenous sources of energy for Europe and should not be shunned for
ideological reasons.
---------------
Japan to urge Asia-Pacific to help strengthen IAEA safeguards
TOKYO, June 26 (Kyodo) - Japan will urge its fellow Asia-Pacific
states to join efforts to strengthen nuclear inspection safeguards
worldwide by signing and implementing protocols adopted by the
International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), a Foreign Ministry
official said Tuesday.
To that end, the government is sponsoring with the IAEA a two-day
symposium starting Wednesday at a Tokyo hotel. The event is aimed at
reinforcing IAEA safeguards in the region by soliciting more
countries to implement the ''Additional Protocols.''
Established in 1997 in the wake of events such as suspected
development of nuclear weapons in Iraq and North Korea, the protocols
allow the IAEA to conduct on-site inspections of nuclear facilities
on advance notices as short as two to 24 hours in countries that have
implemented them.
Those countries are also obliged to provide the agency with a wide
range of information about their activities involving atomic power,
while the IAEA can designate ''sites'' rather than individual
''facilities'' as subjects of its inspections.
Japan, which signed the Additional Protocols in December 1998 and
implemented them a year later, has undergone 19 inspections based on
the arrangement since last November and will share its experiences
with participants at the symposium, the official said.
Of the 55 countries that have signed the protocols so far, 19 -- of
which five are from the Asia-Pacific region -- have implemented them.
The five are Australia, Canada, Indonesia, Japan and New Zealand.
''Japan, a major nuclear power country handling large amounts of
nuclear material, wants to promote the peaceful use of nuclear power
while gaining the trust of the international community, and to that
end we will support the IAEA,'' the official said.
''One of the most important issues facing the IAEA at the moment is
the Additional Protocols. We are holding the seminar in the hopes
that as many countries as possible will implement them,'' the
official added.
Aside from Japan and the IAEA, 15 countries from the region,
including China, the Philippines, South Korea, the United States and
Vietnam, are scheduled to send government representatives well-versed
in disarmament and nonproliferation issues or nuclear energy.
The official said an invitation was extended to North Korea to take
part as an observer, but there was no response as of Tuesday
afternoon.
--------------
SA Parliament told hospital kept organs without consent
26 June, 2001, Australia Broadcasting Corportaion, South Australia's
Human Services Minister Dean Brown says there is evidence of
inappropriate retention of organs and tissues by South Australian
hospitals prior to 1987.
Mr Brown has told the SA Parliament how an initial check of records
failed to turn up evidence on recent claims that remains of stillborn
Australian babies were used in US nuclear experiments decades ago.
But Mr Brown says the check has also revealed that the Women's and
Children's Hospital is holding just under 1,000 specimens retained
after post-mortem examinations at the old Adelaide Children's and
Queen Victoria Hospitals.
He says another 650 specimens, taken from 1957 to 1987, are held in a
clinical science museum and almost 300 hearts have been retained
from babies who died between 1963 and 1990.
"By today's standards, these practices were inappropriate and
unacceptable although consent was given in some cases, in other cases
it clearly was not given," Mr Brown said.
"While this info may cause distress to some families, it is important
that past practices be revealed."
---------------
Bush picks Brookhaven chief for top tech post
PALO ALTO, Calif. (Reuters) - The Bush administration will nominate
John H. Marburger III, director of the Energy Department's Brookhaven
National Laboratory, as director of the White House Office of Science
and Technology, financier and Bush adviser Floyd Kvamme said Monday.
Under Marburger the national lab put into operation the world's
largest particle accelerator for nuclear physics research, expanded
biomedical research and began work on the study of human proteins, an
outgrowth of the human genome initiative.
Marburger, a Democrat and former president of the State University of
New York at Stony Brook, has also been credited with directives to
clean the 55,000-acre national lab of contaminated soil and water.
Kvamme's announcement of Marburger's planned nomination at a
broadband industry and policy conference in Palo Alto surprised some
attendees, who had expected Bush to tap a West Coast expert -- such
as Kvamme himself -- to head the science and technology office.
Kvamme, a longtime Bush supporter and prominent Silicon Valley
venture capitalist, told Reuters he would continue to advise the
White House on technology matters, joking that the Bush
administration now could draw on technology advisors on both coasts.
Marburger "will be east and I'll be west," Kvamme said, noting that
the White House in its search for a new director of the Office of
Science and Technology had been "looking for somebody with broad
experience and an appreciation of practical science issues."
According to Jay Keyworth, Reagan White House science advisor and
past director of the Office of Science Technology Policy in the early
1980s, Marburger meets both requirements.
"At BNL he has been responsible for a lot of life sciences and
computing programs," Keyworth told Reuters. "Those are two of the
most demanding areas the Bush administration is going to face."
The Bush White House has been embroiled in a dispute among
Republicans over federal funding for stem cell research, which uses
cells from human embryos.
Jeffrey Eisenach, president of the Progress & Freedom Foundation
which sponsored Monday's conference, told Reuters that while it was
important that the White House is "getting its ducks in a row" with
the nomination, a number of science and technology slots in the
administration remain vacant.
"Generally there is concern at the slow pace of the administration in
key technology appointments," Eisenach said.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sandy Perle Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800) 548-5100
Director, Technical Extension 2306
ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Service Fax:(714) 668-3149
ICN Pharmaceuticals, Inc. E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net
ICN Plaza, 3300 Hyland Avenue E-Mail: sperle@icnpharm.com
Costa Mesa, CA 92626
Personal Website: http://www.geocities.com/scperle
ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.