[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: So, is reprocessing in America's future?
At 09:51 AM 7/2/01 -0400, JOHN JACOBUS wrote:
>If the United States embraces the reprocessing of nuclear waste -- something
>it has refused to do for the last 24 years -- it could lead to the
>proliferation of technologies that produce plutonium, and boost the amount
>of plutonium available around the world. That, critics say, could make it
>much more likely that weapons-grade plutonium could fall into the hands of
>terrorists or rogue nations.
I hope everyone on RadSafe knows that "weapons-grade" plutonium is very
different from the plutonium produced in a commercial reactor. The
difference is in the amount of Pu-240.
mike
Mike McNaughton
Los Alamos National Lab.
email: mcnaught@LANL.gov or mcnaughton@LANL.gov
phone: (505)667-6130
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.