RE: So, is reprocessing in America's future?

[NECNP <necnp@necnp.org>]

I must agree with Mr. Rockwell that it doesn't have to be plutonium.  The 

Oklahoma City bombing and others have proved that.  But, it doesn't seem to 

make sense to put another potential terrorist weapon out there.



I don't think that I mentioned in my previous post that during the GESMO 

hearings DOE said that it had made a Hiroshima-sized bomb from reactor 

grade Pu.



David Pyles



At 09:59 AM 07/04/2001 -0500, Ted Rockwell wrote:

> > It really

>doesn't need to be a bomb (to contaminate a public bldg).

>

>And it doesn't need to be Pu or even radioactivity.  It could be any of

>scores of neurotoxins, botulisms, or many other bad actors.

>

>Why do we keep telling people that nuclear things pose unprecedented

>hazards?  They don't!  A small truckload of fertilizer will do it.

>

>Ted Rockwell



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.