[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
References to an Earlier "Cruse" Missile and Other loosely related stuff.
Group,
I have just recently finished, "The Cold War Battle Beneath the Sea - THE
SILENT WAR" by John Pina Craven. He was in charge of the Navy's Special
Projects Office for many years and was a key player in development of some
of their deep submersible capabilities. He is referred to in the book
"BLIND MAN'S BLUFF - The Untold Story of American Submarine Espionage"
(Sherry Sontag & Christopher Drew) Dr. Craven makes reference to a Low
Altitude Nuclear Cruise Missile, which is, of course, not the current cruise
missile we are familiar with but an earlier incarnation which was to fly
with an unshielded reactor. According to Dr. Craven, spewing out
radioactive fission products as it went. The concept was that in a Cuban
Missile crisis type situation it would be launched to fly around in the
vicinity of the adversary involved in the crisis with multiple independently
targeted war heads as a not too subtle threat to see reason and do things
our way.
I had heard of an atomic rocket program and sometime ago, I related to the
radsafe group, that there were about 10 large [very large, approximately 20
feet diameter by 100 feet long pressure tanks from that program that had
been transported to NASA Ames Research Center, Mt. View, Calif. for use as
part of one of their wind tunnels. The tanks were subsequently abandoned
near one of the run ways of the co-located Moffett Field Naval Air Station
which has since closed. The tanks were, at the time I inspected them, very
mildly radioactive presumably from neutron activation of cobalt in the steel
alloy used to fabricate the tanks. The tanks were apparently abandoned/left
there when, after having them shipped [from Los Alamos, I think] NASA Ames
was not sure that they met their requirements to a high enough degree of
certainty and did not use them.
I am interested in such history and wonder if anyone out their has knowledge
of that program. It sounded like a real dubious doomsday type device. None
was ever constructed but apparently enough initial work was done to prove it
was feasible to launch such a vehicle. One reason the project was shot
down, according to Dr. Craven, was that it would fly at Mach 3.2 or so and
relative to ABMs of the day, be a pretty vulnerable target thus nullifying
it's effectiveness, if any.
A specific question I have. Dr. Craven refers to the missile contaminating
the land it would pass over but for a scientist or engineer displays the
publics typical misunderstanding of the difference between radiation and
radioactive material.
He refers to contamination of 200 to 300 rads over a swath of a mile or so.
I am curious to know if that should be rads per hour from contamination on
the ground. If so, one would presume that such a concentration would be
very dependent on flight altitude. Meaning higher would likely be less
intense but over a larger path width.
If you have any information I would appreciate hearing from you. You may of
course, reply to me directly unless you think your information is of
interest to the whole group.
A quick second question, on my recent vacation, I chanced upon an old
popular book, "The Story of Atomic Energy" by Laura Fermi in a used book
store. Does anybody know if the author has any connection to Dr. Enrico
Fermi who supervised the construction and operation of the first atomic
pile? Daughter or wife perhaps? Another item I could not resist was a
night light that says "Radioactive" with a standard radiation trefoil, in
black on yellow. The face is a section of a cylinder about 3 by 4.5 inches.
It came from a company called "Accoutrements" in Seattle. They are,
unfortunately, a wholesale operation, minimum order $200
Mini Reviews:
"Blind Man's Bluff", Sherry Sontag & Christopher Drew, Public Affairs -
Persus Group, 1998. I really enjoyed this book. If you like non fiction
about technology and developments or are interested in technical espionage,
you'd probably like the book.
"The Silent War." John P. Craven, Simon and Schuster, New York 2001. I'm
not sorry I read it but it dealt more with organizational issues than I was
interested in. Also the author was constrained about what he could say, due
to his strong desire to stay out of federal prison for violating national
security. If you are really interested in submarine and deep submergence
vehicles it is worth reading but if your interest is milder I would
recommend Blind Mans Bluff instead.
Any opinions expressed are mine alone and do not necessarily represent those
of the Denver VA Medical Center, The Department of Veterans Affairs, or the
U.S. Government.
Peter G. Vernig
Radiation Safety Officer, VA Medical Center, 1055 Clermont St. Denver, CO
80220, ATTN; RSO MS 115
303-399-8020 ext. 2447, peter.vernig@med.va.gov [alternate for business -
vernig.peter@forum.va.gov; private - peter_vernig@hotmail.com] Fax
303-393-5026 [8 - 4:30 MT service] Alternate Fax 303-377-5686
"...whatever is true, whatever is noble, whatever is right, whatever is
pure, whatever is lovely, whatever is admirable, if anything is found to be
excellent or praiseworthy, let your mind dwell on these things." Paul
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.