Re: radioactivity from fossil fuel power stations

[Susan Gawarecki <loc@ICX.NET>]

I think Dr. Cohen's analysis raised some interesting questions and

shouldn't be dismissed, especially if we are taking the concerns of

anti-nuclear activists seriously in this country.  My concerns were with

the geological assumptions.  His arguments might be strengthened if he

were to work closely with an interested geologist at University of

Pittsburgh to ensure that the assumptions accurately reflect current

geological theory and represent a statistically significant potential

radon contribution, when you consider the big geological picture.



Regards,

Susan



BERNARD L COHEN wrote:

> 

> On Wed, 8 Aug 2001, John M Priest Jr wrote:

> 

> > and how many angels can we fit on the head of a pin?

> > please....spare us our bandwidth

> 

>         --When I am asked a question or otherwise challenged on RADSAFE I

> feel that I should respond. I always try to do this as briefly as possible

> to be considerate of other people's bandwidth.



-- 

.....................................................

Susan L. Gawarecki, Ph.D., Executive Director

Oak Ridge Reservation Local Oversight Committee

                       -----                       

A schedule of meetings on DOE issues is posted on our Web site

http://www.local-oversight.org/meetings.html - E-mail loc@icx.net

.....................................................

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.