[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: TMI - the reality





I posted this earlier in the year, but as the topic of TMI is one of those

annual round robin events at Radsafe, I thought I would repost it. This

information was put together as a reality check for those involved in

emergency response who are tasked with plume/post-plume monitoring:



This is from a table that was put together for potential use in nuclear

power plant field team training during an emergency/release. It has long

been recognized that nuclear power plant drill scenarios often have to be

driven to what is commonly called the "blowing chunks" level to drive PAGs.

It was thought that a review of what response and dose assessment teams at

TMI saw would be of some use (and yes it is recognized that some of the

dose assessment data would not have been immediately known, but came from

after the fact assessments, and that there have been subsequent dose

assessments done after the cited reports were published). This of course is

part of the movement to bring back a little realism to drill scenarios.



Table VII. Keeping a Perspective: Summary of significant survey and

doseassessment data on and off site during the accident at Three Mile

Island for the period 28-Mar-79 to 4-16-79.



Description (a) and parameters



Highest ground reading onsite 3-28 2300



NW fence: 365 mR/h beta+gamma, 50 mR/h gamma



On 3-29 at 0500



WNW fence: 150 mR/h beta+gamma, 100 mR/h gamma



Highest reading during accident, helicopter 3-29 1410



15 ft over Unit 2 stack: 3000 mR/h beta+gamma, 400 mR/h gamma



Highest ground reading offsite, 3-29 0600



1 to 2 mile W: 30 mR/h beta+gamma, 20 mR/h gamma



3-28 DOE helicopter could detect plume out to 16 mi



0.1 to 0.2 mR/h



Highest offsite I-131 airborne concentration observed for period 3-28 to

4-12



32 picoCi/m^3 (3.2 × 10^-11 microCi/cm^3)



On 4-16, the highest immediate downwind I-131 concentrations were observed

during charcoal filter bank change-out operations



110 to 120 pCi/m^3 (max 1.2 × 10^-10 microCi/cm^3)



Occupational Doses



3 workers in excess of then 3 rem per quarter NRC limit (3.9 to 4.2 rem),

max 50 rem to skin and 150 rem to extremity



Max population dose estimate



3500 person-rem



Maximum estimated individual offsite whole body external dose



83 mrem



Maximum estimated internal doses to thyroid



Onsite: 53 mrem, adult



Offsite: 6.9 rem, newborn



Notes (b)



General emergency declared 3-28-79 at 0724. Initial dose projections 10

rem/h (Noble gas)to nearest community 1.4 miles away (5 rem evacuation

PAG), but field team measurements reported < 1 mR/h onsite at 0745 and at

nearest community at 0832. Offsite field team in nearest community did

report < 1 mR/h and I-131 near detection limits at 0900 and 3 mR/h at 1030.

Note that few dose rate measurements distinguished between open window

(beta+gamma) and closed window (gamma) instrument readings, or identified

the instruments used by the teams.



Initial air sample results using the Eberline SAM-2/RO-19 system (Dual

channel analyzer with NaI(Tl) scintillation detector, MDA  ~5 x 10^-9

microCi/cm^3) indicated maximum onsite and offsite I-131 airborne

concentrations of 6.8 × 10^-7 microCi/cm^3 and 9.5 × 10^-7 microCi/cm^3,

respectively. Note that the present day 10CFR20 DAC for I-131 is 2.0 ×

10^-8 microCi/cm^3 (Table 2 value 2.0 × 10^-10 microCi/cm^3). Analysis by

GeLi reported I-131 less than MDA, but noble gases were identified.

Counting system could not detect I-131 in the presence of noble gases.



Initial dose projections grossly overestimated the actual dose rates

observed. The release was primarily noble gas with no significant levels of

radioiodine found offsite. No particulates were released.



Radionuclides released to the environment (From Table II-1):



Kr-88 (T_1/2 = 2.8 h) 3.75 × 10^5 Ci (15 % total), Xe-133 (T_1/2 = 5.2 d)

1.58 × 10^6 Ci (63 % total), Xe-133m (T_1/2 = 2.2 d) 2.25 × 10^5 Ci (9 %

total), Xe-135 (T_1/2 = 9.1 h) 3.0 × 105 Ci (12 % total), Xe-135m (T_1/2 =

15.3 min) 2.5 × 10^4 Ci (1 % total), I-131 (T_1/2 = 8.0 d) 1.5 × 10^1 Ci

(0.0006 % total)



(a) NUREG/CR-1250 1-80, Three Mile Island-A Report to the Commissioners and

to the Public, Vol. II, Part 2, Rogovin and Frampton U.S. NRC. Summary

descriptions found from page 384 to 400.



(b) NUREG /CR-1250 Vol. II, Part 3, p.344,  867 to 874 and 1037.



DJWhitfill



Opinions expressed are mine and do not reflect official policies or

positions of the Kansas Department of Health and Environment.











                                                                                                                             

                    "Sandy Perle"                                                                                            

                    <sandyfl@EARTHLINK.NET>        To:     radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu                                       

                    Sent by:                       cc:                                                                       

                    owner-radsafe@list.vand        Subject:     TMI - the reality                                            

                    erbilt.edu                                                                                               

                                                                                                                             

                                                                                                                             

                    08/21/01 04:58 PM                                                                                        

                    Please respond to                                                                                        

                    "Sandy Perle"                                                                                            

                                                                                                                             

                                                                                                                             









Reality is:



Problem >>>  Countermeasures >>>  Results



>From the NEI website:



The Three Mile Island accident and its aftermath. The worst U.S.

nuclear power plant accident occurred at the Three Mile Island Unit 2

reactor near Harrisburg, Pa., on March 28, 1979. The accident was due

to a combination of equipment failure, inadequately designed

instrumentation, and the inability of plant operators to understand

the reactor's condition. Water from the reactor's cooling system

passed into the reactor building, but still within the containment.

The resulting heat that built up in the reactor's core melted the

metal of the fuel assemblies and the fuel pellets began to

disintegrate. Although a small amount of radiation was released, no

injuries, deaths or discernible direct health effects were caused,

according to over a dozen studies conducted between 1981 and 1991.

See especially the University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public

Health

{HYPERLINK "http://www.upmc.edu/newsbureau/gsph/three%5Fmile%5Fisland.

htm"}study, published in April 2000, covering the years 1979-1992 and

involving 32,135 individuals. Regulators and the industry diligently

studied the causes of the accident and developed improved safety

systems, operator training and supervision, and regulations that were

adopted industry-wide, resulting in a substantially safer nuclear

energy industry.



Institute of Nuclear Power Operations founded. In response to

recommendations by the Kemeny Commission, appointed by President

Carter to investigate the Three Mile Island Unit 2 accident, the

industry established the Institute of Nuclear Power Operations in

Oct. 1979. INPO sets performance objectives, criteria, and guidelines

industry-wide for overall nuclear plant operations, and conducts

regular evaluations of nuclear plants. INPO began monitoring

performance indicators in 1981 and formed the National Academy for

Nuclear Training in 1985 to accredit nuclear utilities' training

programs for plant operators and supervisors of operations.



Verifiable improvement after the Three Mile Island accident. In

response to INPO's report to the Commission in Mar. 1989, ten years

after the Three Mile Island Unit 2 accident, John Kemeny, chairman,

said: "The [industry's] improvements over the past decade have been

impressive and are very reassuring." One indication of the industry's

improvement is the subsequent performance of the remaining reactor at

Three Mile Island?Unit 1. In 1989 it achieved a capacity factor a

measure of reliability, efficiency, and safe operation?of 100.03

percent, the best in the world, and in 1999 it set the world's record

for the longest continuous run by a light water reactor, 688 days.





------------------------------------------------------------------------

Sandy Perle                        Tel:(714) 545-0100 / (800) 548-5100

Director, Technical                Extension 2306

ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Service          Fax:(714) 668-3149

ICN Pharmaceuticals, Inc.                E-Mail: sandyfl@earthlink.net

ICN Plaza, 3300 Hyland Avenue            E-Mail: sperle@icnpharm.com

Costa Mesa, CA 92626



Personal Website: http://www.geocities.com/scperle

ICN Worldwide Dosimetry Website: http://www.dosimetry.com



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.









************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.