[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Contaminated Scaffold Knuckles - Turkey Point
If I release something at the DOE 5400.5 limits (say 4000 dpm/100 cm2
total), then I'm in violation of DOT regulations?
Randy Redmond
BWXT Y-12 L.L.C.
Y-12 National Security Complex
Radiological Control Organization
Email: rxq@Y12.doe.gov
Phone: 865-574-5640
Fax: 865-574-0117
> -----Original Message-----
> From: William V Lipton [SMTP:liptonw@dteenergy.com]
> Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 12:28 PM
> To: Redmond, Randy R. (RXQ)
> Cc: Joe Heckman; radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
> Subject: Re: Contaminated Scaffold Knuckles - Turkey Point
>
> I see the irony, here, but you may be taking statements out of context.
>
> (1) Table 1 of RG 1.86 applies to final surveys for releasing a premises,
> i.e.,
> terminating a license. It does NOT apply to releasing material from a
> licensee's restricted area. The NRC provides interpretations of free
> release
> criteria in HPPOS-072, "Guide on 'How Hard You Have to Look' as Part of
> Radioactive Contamination Control Program." This states, "The regulations
> applicable to nuclear power reactor licensees do not provide for release
> of
> materials for unrestricted use that are known to be radioactively
> contaminated
> at any level..." It's subtle and sometimes confusing, but there's a
> difference
> between releasing items from a licensed facility and releasing a facility
> from
> the requirements of a license.
>
> Regardless of the required sensitivity, if any contamination due to
> licensed
> material is detected, an item cannot be free released. However, an item
> with
> detectable radioactivity below the NUREG-1608 thresholds can be shipped to
> an
> authorized receiver without regard to its radioactivity. This is why it's
> important to document these "nonradioactive shipments." Each such
> shipment must
> meet 2 fundamental requirements: (1) activity, both distributed and
> surface
> contamination, below applicable thresholds (may include IATA limits), and
> (2)
> shipment must be to an authorized recipient. I've shipped radioactive
> waste as
> nonradioactive material.
>
> As a practical matter, if you are free releasing material to an unlicensed
> landfill or scrapyard, keep in mind that many of these facilities now have
> portal radiation monitors. These are often set as close to background
> levels as
> the operator can get the setpoint. (The usual technique is to bring the
> setpoint down to where the monitor alarms and then gradually raise it
> until the
> alarm stops.) Thus, even if you have legitimately free released material,
> the
> shipment may still alarm the monitor, and will be rejected. You are
> especiallly
> vulnerable to this if you release materials in small batches, which are
> then
> combined in a bulk container. Although the individual batches do not
> alarm your
> monitors, the aggregate may have enough ram to alarm the monitor at the
> receiving facility.
>
> The NRC has been trying to establish free release levels, but has been
> meeting
> fanatical public opposition. The scrap metal industry also tends to
> oppose
> release limits, since they may get stuck with unmarketable material. Good
> or
> bad, this is something we have to live with.
>
> Just keep in mind that any screwup by any licensee hurts all of us.
>
> The opinions expressed are strictly mine.
> It's not about dose, it's about trust.
>
> Bill Lipton
> liptonw@dteenergy.com
>
>
> "Redmond, Randy R. (RXQ)" wrote:
>
> > "NUREG-1608 provides a threshold value for surface contamination, below
> > which an
> > object may be shipped as nonradioactive. This was apparently
> inadvertently
> > omitted from the regulations. (see section 3.1.2): The threshold is:
> 2200
> > dpm/100 cm2 beta-gamma and 220 dpm/100 cm2 alpha, averaged over 300 cm2.
> (I
> > assume this limit applies to the total of removable and fixed
> > contamination.)"
> >
> > Interesting. Reg Guide 1.86 permits me to free release items in certain
> > radionuclide categories if they are less than 5000 dpm/100 cm2 total and
> > less than 1000 dpm/100 cm2 removable.
> > Randy Redmond
> > BWXT Y-12 L.L.C.
> > Y-12 National Security Complex
> > Radiological Control Organization
> > Email: rxq@Y12.doe.gov
> > Phone: 865-574-5640
> > Fax: 865-574-0117
> >
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.