[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: NRC News release on Terrorists.



John and Jaro and list:
 
Concrete is one of the materials that has been used to insulated structural steel and is better for that task in several respects than the spray-on isulation used in the WTC.  Also the geometry is very different for an airliner impacting against a vertical containment structure vs. one distributing itself around the inside of one or more floors of a high-rise.  In one case the fire is confined and is impossible to attack it effectively.  In the other case, the fire is probably in the open and can be attacked with foam or other agents.  
 
Best regards.
 
Jim Dukelow
Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Richland, WA
jim.dukelow@pnl.gov
 
These comments are mine and have not been reviewed and/or approved by my management or by the U.S. Department of Energy.

 
 
 -----Original Message-----
From: Jacobus, John (OD/ORS) [mailto:jacobusj@ors.od.nih.gov]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 7:32 AM
To: Franta, Jaroslav; radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
Subject: RE: NRC News release on Terrorists.

Jaro,
 
Do you think the burning fuel would cause structural failure?

-- John

John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
3050 Traymore Lane
Bowie, MD  20715-2024

E-mail:  jenday1@email.msn.com (H)     

-----Original Message-----
From: Franta, Jaroslav [mailto:frantaj@AECL.CA]
Sent: Thursday, September 27, 2001 8:50 AM
To: radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
Subject: RE: NRC News release on Terrorists.
 . . .
Although nobody has ever crashed a full-size airliner into a containment building, the impact of its jet engine(s) is more than adequately reproduced by the impact of a single- or twin-jet military fighter plane -- which has actually been done (the famous rocket-sled propelled Phantom jet slamming into a fixed reinforced concrete block...).
 . . .