[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Nukes in Space...



If I recall the space shuttle incident, they had some expensive item they

were going to reel in.  With the mass of the item and the very long cabling

layed out, they broke the cable when they tried to reel it in.  The cable

broke at the cable reel end because this is where the strain is the

greatest.  The amount of strain/inch is greatest at the cable reel end due

to this being the point where the greatest amount of mass must be moved.

The function dStrain/dLength increases as you get closer to the cable real

because the function of mass on the other side of the strain point is also

increasing.  The strain at the other end of the cable would be less due to

the mass of the cable being on the other side of the stress point.  



And finally things at rest desire to stay at rest.  Perhaps if they tried to

accelerate the mass slower, the cable may not have failed.



Perfect topic for high school physics...



Glen Vickers



> -----Original Message-----

> From:	Raymond A. Hoover [SMTP:rayhoover@HOTMAIL.COM]

> Sent:	Wednesday, December 05, 2001 12:23 PM

> To:	neildm@ID.DOE.GOV; ncohen12@HOME.COM; radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

> Subject:	RE: Nukes in Space...

> 

> You are correct.  For this to work, fibers would have to be about 100 

> kilometers long and without a single flaw.  The concept was based on the 

> tensile strength of flawless fibers.

> 

> 

> >From: "Neil, David M" <neildm@ID.DOE.GOV>

> >Reply-To: "Neil, David M" <neildm@ID.DOE.GOV>

> >To: "'Norman Cohen'" <ncohen12@HOME.COM>,        radsafe  

> ><radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>

> >Subject: RE: Nukes in Space...

> >Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2001 07:44:02 -0700

> >

> >If memory serves, and I may be misrecalling it, that concept fails on the

> >basis of tensile strength of the materials. Also, one of the Shuttle 

> >flights

> >did an experiment to some other purpose, dangling an instrument package

> on 

> >a

> >cable, and had to abort the experiment and jettison the equipment due to

> an

> >unexpected effect. I don't recall details on that one.

> >

> >Dave Neil		neildm@id.doe.gov

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >-----Original Message-----

> >From: Norman Cohen [mailto:ncohen12@HOME.COM]

> >Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 8:33 PM

> >To: radsafe

> >Subject: Re: Nukes in Space...

> >

> >

> >Hi Steve,

> >the Magazine was Analog Science Fiction and Science Fact. Be accurate.

> >

> >I wasn't saying we could do this right now, it was just an idea. In fact,

> I

> >posted the same idea on the old radsafe list. I don't recall that you

> >chopped

> >my head off back then. I recall that I was asked if I had any plan for

> >disposing of nuke waste. Thats the best plan I had then and its the best

> >I've

> >got now. Don't like it, just ignore it and my postings.

> >

> >The idea of an equatorial elevator system is that rockets would not be 

> >used.

> >It was many moons ago that I read that article or story, so details are

> >hazy.

> >

> >Speaking about starving, you know I am kinda hungry. Gonna go get me a

> >bagel.

> >

> >Peace

> >Norm

> >

> >Steve Frantz wrote:

> >

> > > I try to resist answering, but this is too ridiculous...

> > >

> > > Norm Cohan writes - - -

> > > I'm Ok with nuclear powered space craft as long as they are

> > > launched in such a way (like from the space station) that there

> > > is no chance of their falling back to earth.

> > > End quote - - -

> > >

> > > And exactly how does the plutonium fuel get to the space station

> > > in the first place? By rocket.

> > >

> > > Norm Cohen writes later in the same posting - -

> > >  I suggested waiting until we had the techology necessary to

> > > safely rocket the waste into the sun via an equator elevator

> > > system which would lift the waste into orbit, and then oone

> > > could send it into the sun. (picked this idea up from an article

> > > years ago in Analog magazine).

> > > End quote - - -

> > >

> > > I read that SCIENCE FICTION story at the time and the author

> > > explained how it was impossible _even in theory_ to build

> > > anything like that. As long as you draw your science from Analog

> > > magazine, you must expect some ridicule.

> > >

> > > Besides, why is the magical elevator safer than rockets? The

> > > point of the story was that it was cheaper.

> > >

> > > Sending nuclear waste to the sun is an absurd idea for many,

> > > many reasons that I won't go into; unless someone wants to start

> > > a thread on it.

> > >

> > > Now, back to starving the stray dog and hoping he goes

> > > elsewhere.

> > >

> > > Stephen Frantz

> > > sfrantz@yahoo.com

> > >

> > > __________________________________________________

> > > Do You Yahoo!?

> > > Buy the perfect holiday gifts at Yahoo! Shopping.

> > > http://shopping.yahoo.com

> > >

> ************************************************************************

> > > You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To 

> >unsubscribe,

> > > send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text 

> >"unsubscribe

> > > radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject 

> >line.

> >

> >--

> >Coalition for Peace and Justice and the UNPLUG Salem Campaign; 321 Barr

> >Ave.,

> >Linwood, NJ 08221; 609-601-8537 or 609-601-8583 (8583: fax, answer 

> >machine);

> >ncohen12@home.com  UNPLUG SALEM WEBSITE:  http://www.unplugsalem.org/

> >COALITION FOR PEACE AND JUSTICE WEBSITE:

> >http:/www.coalitionforpeaceandjustice.org   The Coalition for Peace and

> >Justice is a chapter of Peace Action.

> >"First they ignore you; Then they laugh at you; Then they fight you; Then

> >you

> >win. (Gandhi) "Why walk when you can fly?"  (Mary Chapin Carpenter)

> >

> >

> >

> >

> >************************************************************************

> >You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

> >send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text

> "unsubscribe

> >radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject

> line.

> >************************************************************************

> >You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

> >send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text

> "unsubscribe

> >radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject

> line.

> >

> 

> 

> _________________________________________________________________

> Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp

> 

> ************************************************************************

> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.





************************************************************************

This e-mail and any of its attachments may contain Exelon Corporation

proprietary information, which is privileged, confidential, or subject 

to copyright belonging to the Exelon Corporation family of Companies. 

This e-mail is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity 

to which it is addressed.  If you are not the intended recipient of this 

e-mail, you are hereby notified that any dissemination, distribution, 

copying, or action taken in relation to the contents of and attachments 

to this e-mail is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful.  If you have 

received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately and 

permanently delete the original and any copy of this e-mail and any 

printout. Thank You.

************************************************************************



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.