Re: Risks of low level radiation - New Scientist Article

["Jim Nelson" <nelsonjima@HOTMAIL.COM>]

Dr. Long,



What do you think the cost would be of a double blind, prospective radon 

study?  Wouldn't you have to track thousand of people for 40 years or more?



Jim Nelson





Howard long stated,

>That is why we need dounle-blind, prospective human experiments, like the

>package under bed test suggested by Cameron. The CT-mammography test of 10 

>Rad

>exposure or sham, would mask benefit with the yearly one rad from CT..

>

>Please see if the Iowa raw data is available.

>It seems to be a well-conducted study.

>

>Howard Long

>





_________________________________________________________________

Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.