RE: The 100 years of British radiologists epidemiology study deserves attention.

["Jacobus, John (OD/ORS)" <jacobusj@ors.od.nih.gov>]

Title: The 100 years of British radiologists epidemiology stu

John,

NCRP 126 did not ignore the British radiologist study (see page 145) or the NSWS study (see page 196).  I would suggest that you read the report.  May be you should not continue to cite them as being evidence that "radiation is an essential trace energy."

 

-- John

John Jacobus, MS
Certified Health Physicist
3050 Traymore Lane
Bowie, MD  20715-2024

E-mail:  jenday1@email.msn.com (H)     

-----Original Message-----
From: John Cameron [mailto:jrcamero@facstaff.wisc.edu]
Sent: Friday, December 07, 2001 8:23 AM
To: radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
Subject: The 100 years of British radiologists epidemiology study deserves attention.

 . . .

The recent  NCRP Report No. 136 on LNT ignored both the British radiologists study and the nuclear shipyard worker study (NSWS).  . . .