[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

NCRP Publication 121 and LNT



Radsafers
 
Have the critics of the use of LNT read NCRP Publication 121?
 
Section 3 gives the scientific bases for collective dose and concludes with; "... it is prudent to assume the effect per unit dose in the low dose region following single acute exposures or low dose fractions is a linear response." (ie, LNT), and LNT "..is based on our understanding of the basic mechanisms involved."
 
My conclusion from all the discussions we had during drafting the report is that unless we can prove that ALL cancers have a threashold in ALL people it is prudent to assume LNT for radiation protection. This does not mean it should be applied to cost analysis, etc.
 
I've made this point before but I thought it was worth repeating given the continued discuss here. Please critique my conclusion.

 
John R Johnson, PhD
4535 West 9th Ave.
Vancouver, B. C.
V6R 2E2
(604) 222-9840
idias@interchange.ubc.ca
 
or most mornings
 
Safety Group
Stores (Safety Annex) Room 3,
TRIUMF
4004 Wesbrook Mall
Vancouver, B. C.
V6T 2E3
(604) 222-1047 Ext. 6610
johnsjr@triumf.ca