Re: Independent Yucca Review Raises Questions

[Norman Cohen <ncohen12@HOME.COM>]

Hi Don,

I certainly understand that. My reading of the article indicates that

the

scientists were trying to please both sides, so they gave the 'anti's

some ammo,

but also tried to make the DOE happy.





norm



dkosloff1 wrote:



> It is the function of scientists to raise questions.  However near the

> bottom of the story is the most important information:

>

> Card pointed out that the NWTRB did not disagree with the DOE that a

> repository at Yucca Mountain "would be safe throughout its operating and

> monitoring period, hundreds of years into the future."  Card said there is

> no

> legitimate scientific organization that disagrees on this issue.

>

> Don Kosloff dkosloff1@msn.com

> 2910 Main Street, Perry OH 44081

>

> -





************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/