RE:

[Jack_Earley@RL.GOV]

Visitors/members of the general public are not generally allowed into areas

where that would be a realistic issue. Even in the case of vendors brought

in briefly to oversee testing/installation of equipment, they're not allowed

hands-on work except for their own equipment. If they're anticipated to have

such exposures, they would/should be rad worker trained. Nevertheless, see

my subsequent posting re. survey definition.



Jack Earley

Radiological Engineer





-----Original Message-----

From: Franz Schoenhofer [mailto:franz.schoenhofer@chello.at]

Sent: Friday, February 15, 2002 11:13 AM

To: Jack_Earley@rl.gov; rpconserv@HOTMAIL.COM;

radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

Subject: Re: 







-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----

Von: Jack_Earley@RL.GOV <Jack_Earley@RL.GOV>

An: rpconserv@HOTMAIL.COM <rpconserv@HOTMAIL.COM>;

radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>

Datum: Freitag, 15. Februar 2002 21:11

Betreff: RE:





>It's only a de facto limit if you don't want to use area TLDs to show that

>your tour route produces less than 1 mSv per year. You don't care, nor

>should you, what Joe Public does offsite.

>



Jack,

You forget about ingestion and inhalation and beta-radiation......... You

would need a lot more than a TLD to assess the dose of an individual

received.



Franz







************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line. You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/