[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: the article about the contaminated fawn at Brookhaven lab

To: ncohen12@HOME.COM
Subject: Re: the article about the contaminated fawn at Brookhaven lab
From: AndrewsJP@AOL.COM
Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2002 17:44:22 EST
CC: circhotline@nydailynews.com, radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
Reply-To: AndrewsJP@AOL.COM
Sender: owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

Norm,

The report is not particularly serious. What my letter means is that the reporter did a poor job of reporting the information. Thus the letter to the newspaper.

John Andrews
Knoxville, Tennessee

Prev by Date: Re: Radon's linear dependency
Next by Date: Radon and Smoking (individual vs aggregate)
Prev by thread: Re: the article about the contaminated fawn at Brookhaven lab
Next by thread: Re: the article about the contaminated fawn at Brookhaven lab
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread