[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Meeting public demand
Jerry Cohen wrote:
<<I agree that although democracy may be the best form of government, it
has certain faults. For example, should a benevolent democratic government
give the public what it wants, or what is best for them? It takes a
particularly courageous politician or bureaucrat to do the latter knowing
that would be unpopular.
Could it also be that fear of incurring public disfavor is what
motivates ICRP & NCRP to perpetuate LNT, ALARA, and similar policies?
Although it is unlikely they would be voted out of office, their sources of
funding might certainly be endangered were they to change their course of
action.>>
This could also be called the contractor's conundrum.
Jack Earley
Radiological Engineer
-----Original Message-----
From: Jerry Cohen [mailto:jjcohen@PRODIGY.NET]
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 3:47 PM
To: radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu; Michael Stabin
Subject: Re: Meeting public demand
I agree that although democracy may be the best form of government, it
has certain faults. For example, should a benevolent democratic government
give the public what it wants, or what is best for them? It takes a
particularly courageous politician or bureaucrat to do the latter knowing
that would be unpopular.
In the BRC case, my complaint with the NRC is simply that they were
deceitful (implicitly perhaps, but nevertheless deceitful). By sponsoring
very expensive scientific research programs ostensibly to support their
regulatory efforts, they convey the erroneous impression to the public that
their regulations are scientifically based. If, in fact, their regulations
are simply intended to reflect the public will , that should be explicitly
stated, and any research should be directed toward determining the nature of
regulations that would be popular with the most people. Such a direct
approach would be a lot more efficient and cheaper. All I am asking for is
some honesty and integrity. Is that too much?
Could it also be that fear of incurring public disfavor is what
motivates ICRP & NCRP to perpetuate LNT, ALARA, and similar policies?
Although it is unlikely they would be voted out of office, their sources of
funding might certainly be endangered were they to change their course of
action.
----- Original Message -----
From: Michael Stabin <michael.g.stabin@vanderbilt.edu>
To: Jerry Cohen <jjcohen@PRODIGY.NET>
Cc: <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>
Sent: Sunday, February 24, 2002 2:22 PM
Subject: Re: Meeting public demand
> Jerry Cohen writes -
>
> > My point is that
> > NRC could have saved much time, effort, and most of all, money if they
> had
> > just short-circuited the process by determining the public/political
> climate
> > in the first place and ignored the science which was apparently of
little
> > importance in this case. I am sure there are several other examples of
> this
> > sort of problem . Why bother with the science if it can have no impact
in
> a
> > system pervaded by spin, politics, and PR.
Michael Stabin writes--
> This is indeed a bad situation. It is the supposed antidote to the other
> extreme of the government ramming policies down the public's throat,
because
> "they know what's good for you". The antidote, however, has worked out to
> be, in my opinion, almost as bad as the poison, and at times I refer to
this
> in fairly strong terms as a "failure of democracy". People in a democracy
> don't want the government acting without the consent of the governed, and
I
> am one of them. But with our mass media driven culture, those with the
best
> skill in manipulating opinion, **often intentionally spreading
> misinformation in direct contradiction to known scientific facts** have
> successfully managed to control the debate on many scientific issues, of
> which radiation protection is just one. By appealing to emotion and
> repeating often absurd claims in drumbeat fashion, the public begins to
> speak the mantras of those with the best PR engines, and fact and logic
are
> left as roadkill.
>
> I agree that merely complaining about it on Radsafe is not the answer.
Ruth
> Sponsler's (and others') encouragement to be involved in schools is part
of
> the solution. Barbara Hamrick's call for help in influencing legislation
is
> another good example of how to actively participate in the remedy. Public
> information activities in general are another. I'm quite pleased at the
> astounding success of the HPS' Ask the Expert web site feature. Gen
Roessler
> is doing a marvelous job, and has assembled an Associate Editor team to
> handle the very high volume of requests that are coming in there. I have
> been able to interact with a number of people directly, sometimes
> repeatedly, and try to calm some of their irrational fears, driven by
> irresponsible antinuke groups and the media, about radiation doses from
> simple medical procedures and the like.
>
> This is one of my drumbeats - if you understand radiation, you have a
> professional responsibility to be part of the voice in whatever
communities
> you are part of to help bring a rational perspective to these public
policy
> debates in our society. You can't do it all yourself, and it can't be done
> in a day. But if we each do our part, write our letters, know our facts,
> show respect to our opponents, and hold our ground, it can be done.
>
> "First they ignore you; Then they laugh at you; Then they fight you; Then
> you win."
>
> Mike
>
> Michael G. Stabin, PhD, CHP
> Assistant Professor of Radiology and Radiological Sciences
> Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences
> Vanderbilt University
> 1161 21st Avenue South
> Nashville, TN 37232-2675
> Phone (615) 343-0068
> Fax (615) 322-3764
> e-mail michael.g.stabin@vanderbilt.edu
>
>
>
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/
************************************************************************
You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,
send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu Put the text "unsubscribe
radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.
You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/