[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Criticality accident

To: joseroze@NETVISION.NET.IL, radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu
Subject: Re: Criticality accident
From: RuthWeiner@AOL.COM
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 18:25:22 EST
Reply-To: RuthWeiner@AOL.COM
Sender: owner-radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu

I want to point out that in my email on accidents I gave a VERY brief summary of the Los Alamos report. the investigators investogated EVERY accident since 1943 VERY THOROUGHLY. Please don't judge their report by my superficial and very brief summary. They have looked thoroughly at environmental and public health effects. Again. the speaker was ONLY talking about process accidents. The report of course includes other criticality accidents. the others were not part of this particular talk. Perhaps I dgould have been clearer that I was only giging a brief summary and touching on points that happened to interest me, but PLEASE don't jump to the conclusion that the report itself is superficial or lacking in any way.,

Ruth Weiner, Ph. D.
ruthweiner@aol.com

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Criticality accident
  - From: "J. J. Rozental" <joseroze@NETVISION.NET.IL>

Prev by Date: Re: Criticality accident
Next by Date: RE: UNSCEAR report: HEREDITARY EFFECTS OF RADIATION
Prev by thread: Re: Criticality accident
Next by thread: Re: Criticality accident
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread