For such signs, I suggest something like,
"SAFE for ___ hours here
(= 5 rem - a nuclear workers yearly allowance)"
Who better than radsafe to lead such a project?
(I'm putting this here, because at least one leader is obvious below)
Howard Long
RuthWeiner@AOL.COM wrote:
Actually the group that puts out the report analyzes each accident in detail, and has a training system in place for both workers and managers. An important principle to add to the list, beyon "what caused the accident". etc. is "what are the consequences of an accident." When workers understood this, they were far less likely to take short cuts.I don't think 21 accidents in 60 years qualifies as "many." One point I didn't make was that (as I recall the talk) about 3/4 of the 21 accidents happened before 1965, and almost all of those in the period 1955 to 1965, when the pressure to produce plutoium was very great, in both the U. S. and the Soviet Union. One cause, that was eliminted pretty quickly in the U. S., was the size of the standard chemical processing vessels used. Just using smaller vessels reduced the risk of an accidental criticality considerably.
I might also point out that most of the criticality process accidents were not in the U. S. Russia had the largest number, the U. S. second, and a few in great Britain, France, Japan, etc (these are just the process accidents).
Ruth Weiner, Ph. D.
ruthweiner@aol.com