Re: ENN repost from Inside Science News Service

[Tim <tstead@ntirs.org>]

I disagree.



If a dirty bomb were to be detonated in the US, 25% of

the population exposed to it would develop cancer and

16% of the people exposed will develop fatal cancer.



To the best of my knowledge, those are the current

cancer stats in the USA (if you know what I mean).



It doesn't matter what exacty caused those cancers, it

will immediately be attributed to the minute amount of

radiation the subject received.



As one person said earlier, it's all about perception.

 It's up to us to change those perceptions so that,

hopefully, the dirty bomb could be put into its proper

perspective: a weapon to generate fear and hysteria,

not injuries.



Tim



--- "Neil, David M" <neildm@ID.DOE.GOV> wrote:

> ...

> A dirty bomb "would probably not lead to many, if

> any, cancer deaths," says

> Andrew Karam, radiation safety officer of the

> University of Rochester in

> Rochester, NY. ...

> 

> 

>

http://www.enn.com/direct/display-release.asp?id=6414

> 

> Dave Neil		neildm@id.doe.gov

> 

> 

> 

>

************************************************************************

> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing

> list. To unsubscribe,

> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put

> the text "unsubscribe

> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail,

> with no subject line.

> You can view the Radsafe archives at

> http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/

> 





__________________________________________________

Do You Yahoo!?

Yahoo! Sports - live college hoops coverage

http://sports.yahoo.com/

************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/