Re: image quality, was A LNT Experience

["Franz Schoenhofer" <franz.schoenhofer@CHELLO.AT>]

-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----

Von: Ruth Sponsler <jk5554@YAHOO.COM>

An: Radsafe Mail list <radsafe@list.vanderbilt.edu>

Cc: jk5554@YAHOO.COM <jk5554@YAHOO.COM>

Datum: Donnerstag, 18. April 2002 06:19

Betreff: image quality, was A LNT Experience





>My perspective on this is possibly analogous but may

>be a bit irrelevant, as I am using light photography

>as an analogy to radiography



Dear Ruth (2),



I appreciate your post, because it is a clear confirmation of my "theory",

that natural scientists are not "one track minded", but usually interested

in things other than radiation protection, in your case photography.



Using your analogies: Would you use in the dark crypt of a French monastory

a film of 100 ASA with a zoom-lens of 35 to 70 with an aperture of 3.5 to

4.6 to take photos without flash? No, you would not. As well the dentist

should know, that with his low-definition film he would not be able to

detect an abscess in a tooth.



Best regards,



Franz













************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/