Re: Various Comments- Serious and Otherwise

[muckerheide <muckerheide@attbi.com>]

Maury, 



So, you mean their credibility is down to only something more than 100 times

that of DOE and NRC!?  and 10 times that of HPS and ANS? :-)



Regards, Jim

============



> Hi Brad, years ago, your reference to Consumer Reports would have been widely

> accepted. I think you will find, however, that all of that changed long ago.

> They have become, in my opinion, so politicized that asking them to stage such

> a test would be like asking them to test the fuel tanks on pickup trucks. (g)

> Or asking the Sierra Club for an opinion about drilling for oil in the ANWR

....

> Cheers,

> Maury Siskel   maury@webtexas.com

> =================================================

> -------------------------------snipped  ------------------

> 

>> --Why isn't running a truck into a solid wall, or having a

>>> railroad locomotive crash into it just as effective? These things have

>>> been done and there are films on them available.

>> 

>> Better yet:  Consumer Reports could test Type-B containers!  Nobody will

>> question their results.

>> 

>> Clayton J. Bradt, CHP

>> Principal Radiophysicist

> 

> -------------------  snipped  -----------------------------

> 

> ************************************************************************

> You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

> send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

> radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

> You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/

> 



************************************************************************

You are currently subscribed to the Radsafe mailing list. To unsubscribe,

send an e-mail to Majordomo@list.vanderbilt.edu  Put the text "unsubscribe

radsafe" (no quote marks) in the body of the e-mail, with no subject line.

You can view the Radsafe archives at http://www.vanderbilt.edu/radsafe/